Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FIQFX
CGCYX vs FIQFX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FIQFX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$45.96
Change+$0.26 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$48.37
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
CGCYX vs FIQFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FIQFX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and FIQFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. CGCYX (50.8M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: FIQFX (1.32) vs CGCYX (1.13). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FIQFX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FIQFX (7 years). CGCYX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FIQFX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.28 vs. FIQFX (36.06). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.37 vs. CGCYX (-38.47).
| CGCYX | FIQFX | CGCYX / FIQFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.77 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.77 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.748 | 25.298 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.8M | 1.31B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.32 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.28 | 36.06 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.15 | 51.78 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.47 | 1.37 | -2,811% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement