Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs MCDFX
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$42.56
Change-$0.13 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.97M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. CGCYX (47M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: MCDFX (3.26) vs CGCYX (1.16). CGCYX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: CGCYX (8 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. CGCYX (40.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: MCDFX (2500) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX (23.86) and MCDFX (23.77) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.58 vs. CGCYX (-31.94).
| CGCYX | MCDFX | CGCYX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.245 | 13.498 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47M | 88.3M | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 3.26 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.86 | 23.77 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.62 | -1.98 | 486% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.94 | -8.58 | 372% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement