Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs MCDFX
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$44.27
Change-$0.13 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.47M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.10
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. CGCYX (48.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: MCDFX (3.08) vs CGCYX (1.13). CGCYX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: CGCYX (8 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. CGCYX (40.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: MCDFX (2500) vs CGCYX (1000000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.25 vs. CGCYX (39.08). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.58 vs. CGCYX (-34.50).
| CGCYX | MCDFX | CGCYX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.227 | 21.969 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.5M | 95.7M | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 3.08 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.08 | 41.25 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.16 | 13.41 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.50 | -7.58 | 455% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement