Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs MCDFX
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$51.93
Change+$0.12 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.03M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.43
Change-$0.05 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. CGCYX (56M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: MCDFX (2.78) vs CGCYX (0.96). CGCYX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: CGCYX (9 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. CGCYX (40.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: MCDFX (2500) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.71 vs. MCDFX (24.00). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.28 vs. CGCYX (-31.07).
| CGCYX | MCDFX | CGCYX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.292 | 33.811 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 56M | 104M | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 2.78 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.71 | 24.00 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.64 | 38.77 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.07 | 0.28 | -11,201% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.94 | - |