Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs MCDFX
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$45.96
Change+$0.26 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. CGCYX (50.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: MCDFX (3.08) vs CGCYX (1.13). CGCYX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: CGCYX (9 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. CGCYX (40.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: MCDFX (2500) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX (43.28) and MCDFX (42.70) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.31 vs. CGCYX (-38.47).
| CGCYX | MCDFX | CGCYX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.748 | 24.648 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.8M | 95.7M | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 3.08 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.28 | 42.70 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.15 | 17.69 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.47 | -7.31 | 527% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement