Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs MCDFX
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$42.03
Change-$0.84 (-1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.81M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.30
Change-$0.20 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and MCDFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. CGCYX (46.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: MCDFX (3.62) vs CGCYX (1.21). CGCYX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: CGCYX (8 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. CGCYX (40.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: MCDFX (2500) vs CGCYX (1000000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.13 vs. CGCYX (20.65). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.33 vs. CGCYX (-27.52).
| CGCYX | MCDFX | CGCYX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.810 | 12.616 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.8M | 93.9M | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 3.62 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.65 | 22.13 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.51 | 3.33 | -135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.52 | -3.33 | 826% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers