Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs MCDFX
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$50.75
Change-$0.59 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.43M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.40
Change+$0.11 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. CGCYX (54.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: MCDFX (2.90) vs CGCYX (1.06). CGCYX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: CGCYX (9 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. CGCYX (40.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: MCDFX (2500) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.54 vs. MCDFX (51.60). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.18 vs. CGCYX (-28.13).
| CGCYX | MCDFX | CGCYX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.020 | 32.169 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.4M | 99.4M | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 2.90 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.54 | 51.60 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.16 | 30.24 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.13 | -0.18 | 15,550% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement