Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs MICHX
CGCYX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs MICHX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$45.96
Change+$0.26 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$11.63
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.26M
CGCYX vs MICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. MICHX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and MICHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 66.3M vs. CGCYX (50.8M). MICHX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: MICHX (1.35) vs CGCYX (1.13). CGCYX was incepted earlier than MICHX: CGCYX (9 years) vs MICHX (8 years). MICHX (1.50) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). MICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. CGCYX (40.00). MICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: MICHX (100000) vs CGCYX (1000000). MICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.72 vs. CGCYX (43.28). CGCYX return over 5 years is better than : -38.47 vs. MICHX (-41.73).
| CGCYX | MICHX | CGCYX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.20 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.50 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.748 | 28.256 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.8M | 66.3M | 77% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.35 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.28 | 52.72 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.15 | 3.32 | 246% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.47 | -41.73 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement