Ad is loading...
CGCYX vs TRCLX
CGCYX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs TRCLX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$39.81
Change+$0.32 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.85M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$10.88
Change+$0.17 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.64M
CGCYX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGCYX has more cash in the bank: 44.9M vs. TRCLX (40.6M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: TRCLX (1.68) vs CGCYX (1.19). CGCYX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: CGCYX (8 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. CGCYX (40.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: TRCLX (500000) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.29 vs. TRCLX (6.90). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.52 vs. CGCYX (-25.96).
| CGCYX | TRCLX | CGCYX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.10 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.064 | 1.420 | 356% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.9M | 40.6M | 111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.68 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.29 | 6.90 | 280% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.19 | -2.20 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.96 | 3.52 | -738% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...