Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs TRCLX
CGCYX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs TRCLX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$45.96
Change+$0.26 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.35
Change+$0.11 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.76M
CGCYX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 59.8M vs. CGCYX (50.8M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: TRCLX (1.56) vs CGCYX (1.13). CGCYX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: CGCYX (9 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. CGCYX (40.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: TRCLX (500000) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX (43.28) and TRCLX (42.94) have marching annual gain over last year. TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.52 vs. CGCYX (-38.47).
| CGCYX | TRCLX | CGCYX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.10 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.748 | 25.379 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.8M | 59.8M | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.56 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.28 | 42.94 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.15 | 13.47 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.47 | -6.52 | 590% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement