CGEAF
Price
$46.02
Change
-$2.12 (-4.40%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.96B
CLCMF
Price
$3.03
Change
-$0.59 (-16.30%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGEAF vs CLCMF

Header iconCGEAF vs CLCMF Comparison
Open Charts CGEAF vs CLCMFBanner chart's image
Cogeco Communications
Price$46.02
Change-$2.12 (-4.40%)
Volume$3.66K
Capitalization1.96B
Sinch AB
Price$3.03
Change-$0.59 (-16.30%)
Volume$10
Capitalization2.69B
CGEAF vs CLCMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGEAF vs. CLCMF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGEAF is a Hold and CLCMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CGEAF: $46.02 vs. CLCMF: $3.03)
Brand notoriety: CGEAF and CLCMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGEAF: 37% vs. CLCMF: 1%
Market capitalization -- CGEAF: $1.96B vs. CLCMF: $2.69B
CGEAF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $1.96B. CLCMF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGEAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLCMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGEAF is a better buy in the long-term than CLCMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGEAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLCMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGEAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • CLCMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLCMF is a better buy in the short-term than CGEAF.

Price Growth

CGEAF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -4.40% price change this week, while CLCMF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.03% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLCMF($2.69B) has a higher market cap than CGEAF($1.96B). CLCMF has higher P/E ratio than CGEAF: CLCMF (134.09) vs CGEAF (8.28). CLCMF YTD gains are higher at: 59.411 vs. CGEAF (-1.709). CLCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.01B vs. CGEAF (1.42B). CLCMF has more cash in the bank: 717M vs. CGEAF (245M). CGEAF has less debt than CLCMF: CGEAF (4.78B) vs CLCMF (5.96B). CLCMF has higher revenues than CGEAF: CLCMF (28.5B) vs CGEAF (2.95B).
CGEAFCLCMFCGEAF / CLCMF
Capitalization1.96B2.69B73%
EBITDA1.42B3.01B47%
Gain YTD-1.70959.411-3%
P/E Ratio8.28134.096%
Revenue2.95B28.5B10%
Total Cash245M717M34%
Total Debt4.78B5.96B80%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGEAF vs CLCMF: Fundamental Ratings
CGEAF
CLCMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9596
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5399
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGEAF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLCMF (91). This means that CGEAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.

CGEAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCMF (100). This means that CGEAF’s stock grew similarly to CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.

CGEAF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCMF (96). This means that CGEAF’s stock grew similarly to CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.

CLCMF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CGEAF (76). This means that CLCMF’s stock grew similarly to CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CGEAF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLCMF (99). This means that CGEAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGEAFCLCMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RRRAX21.590.20
+0.94%
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities A
FIRTX10.110.08
+0.80%
Fidelity Advisor Intl Real Estate M
RSSYX26.750.19
+0.72%
Victory RS Select Growth Y
CMEUX23.590.13
+0.55%
Six Circles Mgd Eq Port US Uncons
JSGIX31.760.17
+0.54%
JHancock U.S. Growth I

CGEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGEAF and CGECF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGEAF and CGECF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGEAF
1D Price
Change %
CGEAF100%
N/A
CGECF - CGEAF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - CGEAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - CGEAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTGOF - CGEAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZQIF - CGEAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCMF and TIAOF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCMF and TIAOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLCMF
1D Price
Change %
CLCMF100%
N/A
TIAOF - CLCMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FYBR - CLCMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
CGEAF - CLCMF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - CLCMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - CLCMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More