Ad is loading...
CGFAX vs PBQQX
CGFAX vs PBQQX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PBQQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$65.70
Change-$3.92 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
PGIM Jennison Blend R6
Price$21.50
Change-$1.35 (-5.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets991.68M
CGFAX vs PBQQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PBQQX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and PBQQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. PBQQX (992M). PBQQX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: PBQQX (0.84) vs CGFAX (0.39). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PBQQX: CGFAX (23 years) vs PBQQX (7 years). PBQQX (2.99) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). PBQQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). PBQQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: PBQQX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.10 vs. PBQQX (-5.91). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 71.66 vs. PBQQX (57.81).
| CGFAX | PBQQX | CGFAX / PBQQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.64 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.99 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.839 | -6.083 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 992M | 28,226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.84 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.10 | -5.91 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.33 | 1.56 | 341% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.66 | 57.81 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers