Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RMBGX
CGFAX vs RMBGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RMBGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
CGFAX vs RMBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RMBGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and RMBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. RMBGX (116M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RMBGX: CGFAX (0.32) vs RMBGX (0.10). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RMBGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RMBGX (9 years). RMBGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMBGX (10.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBGX: CGFAX (250) vs RMBGX (100000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. RMBGX (3.66). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. RMBGX (31.85).
| CGFAX | RMBGX | CGFAX / RMBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.99 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.99 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.270 | 6.100 | 234% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 116M | 283,621% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.10 | 335% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 3.66 | 398% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 6.74 | 635% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | 31.85 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement