Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RMBHX
CGFAX vs RMBHX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RMBHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$86.82
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
CGFAX vs RMBHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RMBHX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and RMBHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. RMBHX (116M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RMBHX: CGFAX (0.32) vs RMBHX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RMBHX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RMBHX (50 years). RMBHX (1.24) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMBHX (10.00). RMBHX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBHX: CGFAX (250) vs RMBHX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.48 vs. RMBHX (1.72). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.92 vs. RMBHX (32.31).
| CGFAX | RMBHX | CGFAX / RMBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.24 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.24 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 50 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.671 | 7.603 | 246% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 70% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 116M | 293,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.48 | 1.72 | 1,015% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.49 | 20.62 | 308% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.92 | 32.31 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.51 | -6.01 | -1,840% |