Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs SLGCX
CGFAX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.71
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$5.99
Change+$0.04 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.98M
CGFAX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. SLGCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and SLGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. SLGCX (40M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: CGFAX (0.30) vs SLGCX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: CGFAX (24 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.84 vs. SLGCX (-49.19). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.52 vs. SLGCX (-63.59).
| CGFAX | SLGCX | CGFAX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.67 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.67 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.787 | 15.534 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 40M | 817,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.84 | -49.19 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.98 | -37.50 | -168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.52 | -63.59 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.75 | -75.52 | -125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement