Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TBDCX
CGFAX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.04
Change-$0.57 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$13.54
Change-$0.08 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.07M
CGFAX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TBDCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. TBDCX (437M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: CGFAX (0.31) vs TBDCX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: CGFAX (24 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: CGFAX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.00 vs. TBDCX (1.72). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.29 vs. TBDCX (-6.00).
| CGFAX | TBDCX | CGFAX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.90 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.96 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.972 | 16.014 | 118% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 437M | 78,490% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.00 | 1.72 | 873% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.98 | 79.21 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.29 | -6.00 | -721% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.39 | 38.13 | 287% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement