Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs UMLGX
CGFAX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$7.64
Change-$0.05 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets661.34M
CGFAX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. UMLGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and UMLGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. UMLGX (661M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than UMLGX: CGFAX (0.32) vs UMLGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). UMLGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: CGFAX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. UMLGX (-11.06). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.66 vs. UMLGX (-49.10).
| CGFAX | UMLGX | CGFAX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.80 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | -12.486 | -126% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 661M | 50,227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | -11.06 | -166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | 5.09 | 1,186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | -49.10 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | -56.24 | -187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers