Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs UMLGX
CGFAX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.71
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$8.01
Change+$0.08 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets650.77M
CGFAX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. UMLGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and UMLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. UMLGX (651M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than UMLGX: CGFAX (0.30) vs UMLGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). UMLGX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: CGFAX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.84 vs. UMLGX (-17.40). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.52 vs. UMLGX (-51.32).
| CGFAX | UMLGX | CGFAX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.80 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.787 | -9.164 | -172% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 651M | 50,230% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.84 | -17.40 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.98 | 8.78 | 717% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.52 | -51.32 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.75 | -56.57 | -167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement