Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WLGRX
CGFAX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$82.26
Change-$0.15 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$35.27
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.12B
CGFAX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WLGRX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. WLGRX (8.12B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: CGFAX (0.32) vs WLGRX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: CGFAX (23 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: WLGRX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.55 vs. WLGRX (17.29). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.84 vs. WLGRX (33.04).
| CGFAX | WLGRX | CGFAX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.14 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.24 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.438 | 5.948 | 209% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 8.12B | 4,003% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.55 | 17.29 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.48 | 33.14 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.84 | 33.04 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.78 | 82.65 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement