Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs ZVGNX
CGFAX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$57.37
Change+$0.47 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.38M
CGFAX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and ZVGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. ZVGNX (76.4M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than ZVGNX: CGFAX (0.32) vs ZVGNX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: CGFAX (24 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGNX (18.83). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: CGFAX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). ZVGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.24 vs. CGFAX (18.35). ZVGNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.65 vs. CGFAX (42.66).
| CGFAX | ZVGNX | CGFAX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.30 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.62 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | 16.558 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 76.4M | 434,555% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | 45.24 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | 114.95 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | 46.65 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | 484.81 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement