Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs ZVGNX
CGFAX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.26
Change-$0.59 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$55.86
Change-$0.77 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.23M
CGFAX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and ZVGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. ZVGNX (73.2M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than ZVGNX: CGFAX (0.30) vs ZVGNX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: CGFAX (24 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGNX (11.55). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: CGFAX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). ZVGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.24 vs. CGFAX (7.06). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.37 vs. ZVGNX (20.06).
| CGFAX | ZVGNX | CGFAX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.30 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.62 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.172 | 15.055 | 101% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 73.2M | 450,820% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.06 | 16.24 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.11 | 138.14 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.37 | 20.06 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.71 | 431.24 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement