Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs ZVGNX
CGFAX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$86.28
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$60.02
Change+$0.15 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.13M
CGFAX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and ZVGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. ZVGNX (78.1M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than ZVGNX: CGFAX (0.31) vs ZVGNX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: CGFAX (24 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGNX (11.55). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: CGFAX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). ZVGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.77 vs. CGFAX (11.47). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.47 vs. ZVGNX (27.46).
| CGFAX | ZVGNX | CGFAX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.30 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.62 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.933 | 21.942 | 82% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 78.1M | 431,498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 38.77 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.49 | 144.58 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.47 | 27.46 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.22 | 497.21 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement