Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs ZVNIX
CGFAX vs ZVNIX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs ZVNIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.04
Change-$0.57 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
Price$44.88
Change+$0.75 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.32M
CGFAX vs ZVNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. ZVNIX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and ZVNIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. ZVNIX (135M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than ZVNIX: CGFAX (0.31) vs ZVNIX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than ZVNIX: CGFAX (24 years) vs ZVNIX (10 years). ZVNIX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNIX (13.62). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNIX: CGFAX (250) vs ZVNIX (50000). ZVNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.00 vs. CGFAX (15.00). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.29 vs. ZVNIX (17.77).
| CGFAX | ZVNIX | CGFAX / ZVNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.22 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.972 | 13.649 | 139% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 135M | 254,074% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.00 | 24.00 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.98 | 122.88 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.29 | 17.77 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.39 | 348.02 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement