CGGO | LGI | CGGO / LGI | |
Gain YTD | 19.438 | 19.291 | 101% |
Net Assets | 7.59B | 242M | 3,134% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
Turnover | 26.00 | 21.00 | 124% |
Yield | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
Fund Existence | 4 years | 21 years | - |
CGGO | LGI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 2 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 6 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago88% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago76% | 13 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGGO has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGGO jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CGGO | 100% | -0.58% | ||
BN - CGGO | 79% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
TSM - CGGO | 74% Closely correlated | -2.77% | ||
BX - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
NVDA - CGGO | 72% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
TEL - CGGO | 72% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LGI and BAH have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGI and BAH's prices will move in lockstep.