CGHLY
Price
$23.00
Change
+$1.96 (+9.32%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
6.06B
CRGGF
Price
$2.81
Change
+$0.32 (+12.85%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
7.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGHLY vs CRGGF

Header iconCGHLY vs CRGGF Comparison
Open Charts CGHLY vs CRGGFBanner chart's image
China Gas Holdings
Price$23.00
Change+$1.96 (+9.32%)
Volume$165
Capitalization6.06B
China Resources Gas Group
Price$2.81
Change+$0.32 (+12.85%)
Volume$4.61K
Capitalization7.98B
CGHLY vs CRGGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGHLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGHLY vs. CRGGF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGHLY is a Buy and CRGGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CGHLY: $23.00 vs. CRGGF: $2.81)
Brand notoriety: CGHLY and CRGGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Gas Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGHLY: 88% vs. CRGGF: 93%
Market capitalization -- CGHLY: $6.06B vs. CRGGF: $7.98B
CGHLY [@Gas Distributors] is valued at $6.06B. CRGGF’s [@Gas Distributors] market capitalization is $7.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Gas Distributors] industry ranges from $29.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Gas Distributors] industry is $8.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGHLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRGGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGHLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CGHLY and CRGGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGHLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRGGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGHLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CRGGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRGGF is a better buy in the short-term than CGHLY.

Price Growth

CGHLY (@Gas Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CRGGF (@Gas Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGHLY is expected to report earnings on Jun 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Gas Distributors (+1.77% weekly)

Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRGGF($7.98B) has a higher market cap than CGHLY($6.06B). CRGGF has higher P/E ratio than CGHLY: CRGGF (13.32) vs CGHLY (10.80). CGHLY YTD gains are higher at: 8.972 vs. CRGGF (-34.803). CRGGF (11.1B) and CGHLY (11B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CGHLY has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. CRGGF (7B). CRGGF has less debt than CGHLY: CRGGF (14.9B) vs CGHLY (60.1B). CGHLY (92.3B) and CRGGF (91.4B) have equivalent revenues.
CGHLYCRGGFCGHLY / CRGGF
Capitalization6.06B7.98B76%
EBITDA11B11.1B99%
Gain YTD8.972-34.803-26%
P/E Ratio10.8013.3281%
Revenue92.3B91.4B101%
Total Cash13.9B7B199%
Total Debt60.1B14.9B403%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGHLY vs CRGGF: Fundamental Ratings
CGHLY
CRGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4749
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10053
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4881
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5647
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
15n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGHLY's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CRGGF (41). This means that CGHLY’s stock grew similarly to CRGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CGHLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CRGGF (100). This means that CGHLY’s stock grew similarly to CRGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CRGGF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGHLY (100). This means that CRGGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.

CGHLY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRGGF (81). This means that CGHLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CRGGF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CGHLY (56). This means that CRGGF’s stock grew similarly to CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGHLYCRGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGHLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESIX30.310.34
+1.14%
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF
IVVB31.080.07
+0.24%
iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF
SMIG29.310.04
+0.14%
Bahl & Gaynor Sm/Md Cp Inc Gr ETF
MMJJF0.03N/A
N/A
HYGROVEST LTD.
EBIZ30.61-0.10
-0.33%
Global X E-commerce ETF

CGHLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGHLY and XNGSY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGHLY and XNGSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGHLY
1D Price
Change %
CGHLY100%
N/A
XNGSY - CGHLY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XNGSF - CGHLY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
APAJF - CGHLY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BIPC - CGHLY
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
NI - CGHLY
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
More

CRGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRGGF and NI have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRGGF and NI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRGGF
1D Price
Change %
CRGGF100%
N/A
NI - CRGGF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
NFE - CRGGF
12%
Poorly correlated
+6.89%
OGS - CRGGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
RGCO - CRGGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
CGHLY - CRGGF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More