CGHLY
Price
$24.62
Change
-$2.30 (-8.54%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.39B
NI
Price
$40.30
Change
+$0.46 (+1.15%)
Updated
Sep 5, 03:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.75B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGHLY vs NI

Header iconCGHLY vs NI Comparison
Open Charts CGHLY vs NIBanner chart's image
China Gas Holdings
Price$24.62
Change-$2.30 (-8.54%)
Volume$439
Capitalization5.39B
NiSource
Price$40.30
Change+$0.46 (+1.15%)
Volume$12.48K
Capitalization18.75B
CGHLY vs NI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGHLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGHLY vs. NI commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGHLY is a Hold and NI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CGHLY: $24.62 vs. NI: $39.83)
Brand notoriety: CGHLY and NI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Gas Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGHLY: 70% vs. NI: 400%
Market capitalization -- CGHLY: $5.39B vs. NI: $18.75B
CGHLY [@Gas Distributors] is valued at $5.39B. NI’s [@Gas Distributors] market capitalization is $18.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Gas Distributors] industry ranges from $29.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Gas Distributors] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGHLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGHLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGHLY is a better buy in the long-term than NI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGHLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGHLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NI is a better buy in the short-term than CGHLY.

Price Growth

CGHLY (@Gas Distributors) experienced а -4.57% price change this week, while NI (@Gas Distributors) price change was -5.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

NI is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Gas Distributors (-1.11% weekly)

Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NI($18.8B) has a higher market cap than CGHLY($5.39B). NI has higher P/E ratio than CGHLY: NI (21.19) vs CGHLY (12.81). CGHLY YTD gains are higher at: 21.687 vs. NI (10.676). CGHLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10B vs. NI (2.81B). CGHLY has higher revenues than NI: CGHLY (79.3B) vs NI (6.13B).
CGHLYNICGHLY / NI
Capitalization5.39B18.8B29%
EBITDA10B2.81B357%
Gain YTD21.68710.676203%
P/E Ratio12.8121.1960%
Revenue79.3B6.13B1,294%
Total CashN/A335M-
Total DebtN/A15.8B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGHLY vs NI: Fundamental Ratings
CGHLY
NI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9154
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10013
SMR RATING
1..100
9968
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3245
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a43

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGHLY's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NI (67) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that CGHLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NI’s over the last 12 months.

NI's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Gas Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGHLY (100) in the null industry. This means that NI’s stock grew significantly faster than CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.

NI's SMR Rating (68) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as CGHLY (99) in the null industry. This means that NI’s stock grew similarly to CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.

CGHLY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as NI (51) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that CGHLY’s stock grew similarly to NI’s over the last 12 months.

CGHLY's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as NI (45) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that CGHLY’s stock grew similarly to NI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGHLYNI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGHLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AICCX64.650.51
+0.80%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer C
TGIRX32.400.09
+0.28%
Thornburg International Equity R6
NCLEX28.55N/A
N/A
Nicholas Limited Edition I
JSVRX28.71N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Value R5
PGSLX11.45N/A
N/A
Principal Global Listed Inf Inst

CGHLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGHLY and XNGSY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGHLY and XNGSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGHLY
1D Price
Change %
CGHLY100%
N/A
XNGSY - CGHLY
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
XNGSF - CGHLY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APAJF - CGHLY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BIPC - CGHLY
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
NI - CGHLY
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.71%
More