CGHLY
Price
$22.46
Change
+$0.97 (+4.51%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.06B
NI
Price
$39.29
Change
+$0.34 (+0.87%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
12.3B
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CGHLY vs NI

Header iconCGHLY vs NI Comparison
Open Charts CGHLY vs NIBanner chart's image
China Gas Holdings
Price$22.46
Change+$0.97 (+4.51%)
Volume$430
Capitalization6.06B
NiSource
Price$39.29
Change+$0.34 (+0.87%)
Volume$3.94M
Capitalization12.3B
CGHLY vs NI Comparison Chart
Loading...
NI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGHLY vs. NI commentary
Apr 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGHLY is a Hold and NI is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CGHLY: $22.46 vs. NI: $39.29)
Brand notoriety: CGHLY and NI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Gas Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGHLY: 167% vs. NI: 73%
Market capitalization -- CGHLY: $6.06B vs. NI: $12.3B
CGHLY [@Gas Distributors] is valued at $6.06B. NI’s [@Gas Distributors] market capitalization is $12.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Gas Distributors] industry ranges from $29.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Gas Distributors] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGHLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CGHLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NI is a better buy in the long-term than CGHLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CGHLY (@Gas Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NI (@Gas Distributors) price change was +3.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was +4.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

NI is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Gas Distributors (+4.25% weekly)

Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NI($12.3B) has a higher market cap than CGHLY($6.06B). NI has higher P/E ratio than CGHLY: NI (18.57) vs CGHLY (10.80). NI YTD gains are higher at: 7.691 vs. CGHLY (6.414). CGHLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11B vs. NI (2.22B). CGHLY has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. NI (2.25B). NI has less debt than CGHLY: NI (14.1B) vs CGHLY (60.1B). CGHLY has higher revenues than NI: CGHLY (92.3B) vs NI (5.51B).
CGHLYNICGHLY / NI
Capitalization6.06B12.3B49%
EBITDA11B2.22B495%
Gain YTD6.4147.69183%
P/E Ratio10.8018.5758%
Revenue92.3B5.51B1,677%
Total Cash13.9B2.25B619%
Total Debt60.1B14.1B426%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGHLY vs NI: Fundamental Ratings
CGHLY
NI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4978
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1007
SMR RATING
1..100
10073
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5118
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGHLY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NI (64) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that CGHLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NI’s over the last 12 months.

NI's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Gas Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGHLY (100) in the null industry. This means that NI’s stock grew significantly faster than CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.

NI's SMR Rating (73) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as CGHLY (100) in the null industry. This means that NI’s stock grew similarly to CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.

NI's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as CGHLY (44) in the null industry. This means that NI’s stock grew similarly to CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.

NI's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGHLY (51) in the null industry. This means that NI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOR41.101.40
+3.51%
Source Capital
GLQ5.950.10
+1.80%
Clough Global Equity Fund
RPV86.130.86
+1.01%
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
VTI258.750.54
+0.21%
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
TBJL19.81-0.09
-0.43%
Innovator 20+ Year Tsy Bd Bfr ETF July

CGHLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGHLY and XNGSY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGHLY and XNGSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGHLY
1D Price
Change %
CGHLY100%
N/A
XNGSY - CGHLY
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
XNGSF - CGHLY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APAJF - CGHLY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BIPC - CGHLY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
NI - CGHLY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
More