CGHLY vs XNGSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGHLY is a Hold and XNGSF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGHLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXNGSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CGHLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- XNGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CGHLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XNGSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CGHLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- XNGSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CGHLY (@Gas Distributors) experienced а -4.01% price change this week, while XNGSF (@Gas Distributors) price change was -6.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was -4.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.78%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Gas Distributors (-4.61% weekly)Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.
| CGHLY | XNGSF | CGHLY / XNGSF | |
| Capitalization | 6.06B | 13.6B | 45% |
| EBITDA | 11B | 11B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | -6.796 | -0.378 | 1,799% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.80 | 16.81 | 64% |
| Revenue | 92.3B | 110B | 84% |
| Total Cash | 13.9B | 12B | 116% |
| Total Debt | 60.1B | 22.3B | 270% |
CGHLY | XNGSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGHLY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as XNGSF (32). This means that CGHLY’s stock grew similarly to XNGSF’s over the last 12 months.
CGHLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as XNGSF (100). This means that CGHLY’s stock grew similarly to XNGSF’s over the last 12 months.
XNGSF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGHLY (100). This means that XNGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.
XNGSF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CGHLY (55). This means that XNGSF’s stock grew similarly to CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.
XNGSF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CGHLY (77). This means that XNGSF’s stock grew similarly to CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.
| CGHLY | XNGSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 70% |
CGHLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGHLY and XNGSY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGHLY and XNGSY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGHLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGHLY | 100% | -1.79% | ||
| XNGSY - CGHLY | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| XNGSF - CGHLY | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| APAJF - CGHLY | 9% Poorly correlated | -7.31% | ||
| BIPC - CGHLY | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
| NI - CGHLY | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||
XNGSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XNGSF has been loosely correlated with XNGSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XNGSF jumps, then XNGSY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XNGSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XNGSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| XNGSY - XNGSF | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| CGHLY - XNGSF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNMRF - XNGSF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SUUIF - XNGSF | 8% Poorly correlated | -3.34% | ||
| ITGGF - XNGSF | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
More | ||||