Ad is loading...
CGHOF
Price
$0.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
OGS
Price
$75.40
Change
+$1.21 (+1.63%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
93 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CGHOF vs OGS

Header iconCGHOF vs OGS Comparison
Open Charts CGHOF vs OGSBanner chart's image
China Gas Holdings
Price$0.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
ONE GAS
Price$75.40
Change+$1.21 (+1.63%)
Volume$343.66K
CapitalizationN/A
CGHOF vs OGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
OGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGHOF vs. OGS commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGHOF is a Hold and OGS is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CGHOF: $0.85 vs. OGS: $75.40)
Brand notoriety: CGHOF and OGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Gas Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGHOF: 220% vs. OGS: 91%
Market capitalization -- CGHOF: $6.06B vs. OGS: $3.65B
CGHOF [@Gas Distributors] is valued at $6.06B. OGS’s [@Gas Distributors] market capitalization is $3.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Gas Distributors] industry ranges from $29.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Gas Distributors] industry is $8.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGHOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGHOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OGS is a better buy in the long-term than CGHOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OGS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OGS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CGHOF (@Gas Distributors) experienced а -3.04% price change this week, while OGS (@Gas Distributors) price change was +2.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

OGS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Gas Distributors (-0.58% weekly)

Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGHOF($6.06B) has a higher market cap than OGS($3.65B). OGS has higher P/E ratio than CGHOF: OGS (15.37) vs CGHOF (10.72). OGS YTD gains are higher at: 22.063 vs. CGHOF (-3.628). CGHOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11B vs. OGS (667M). CGHOF has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. OGS (18.8M). OGS has less debt than CGHOF: OGS (3.05B) vs CGHOF (60.1B). CGHOF has higher revenues than OGS: CGHOF (92.3B) vs OGS (2.37B).
CGHOFOGSCGHOF / OGS
Capitalization6.06B3.65B166%
EBITDA11B667M1,649%
Gain YTD-3.62822.063-16%
P/E Ratio10.7215.3770%
Revenue92.3B2.37B3,891%
Total Cash13.9B18.8M73,936%
Total Debt60.1B3.05B1,971%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGHOF vs OGS: Fundamental Ratings
CGHOF
OGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6374
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7834
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGHOF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OGS (44) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that CGHOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OGS’s over the last 12 months.

CGHOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as OGS (100) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that CGHOF’s stock grew similarly to OGS’s over the last 12 months.

CGHOF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as OGS (74) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that CGHOF’s stock grew similarly to OGS’s over the last 12 months.

OGS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as CGHOF (72) in the null industry. This means that OGS’s stock grew similarly to CGHOF’s over the last 12 months.

OGS's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGHOF (78) in the null industry. This means that OGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGHOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMNVX139.06-0.96
-0.69%
ClearBridge Value I
CAMOX30.25-0.29
-0.95%
Cambiar Opportunity Inv
WSHFX63.92-0.73
-1.13%
American Funds Washington Mutual F1
FSLCX19.31-0.31
-1.58%
Fidelity Small Cap Stock
COMZX37.99-0.66
-1.71%
DWS Communications Inst

CGHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGHOF and APAJF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGHOF and APAJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGHOF
1D Price
Change %
CGHOF100%
N/A
APAJF - CGHOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.00%
OGS - CGHOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
ENGGF - CGHOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NI - CGHOF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
CGHLY - CGHOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OGS has been closely correlated with NJR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OGS jumps, then NJR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OGS
1D Price
Change %
OGS100%
+1.63%
NJR - OGS
80%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
BKH - OGS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
CPK - OGS
74%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
SR - OGS
74%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
NWN - OGS
68%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
More