Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGIE vs UMMA
CGIE vs UMMA Comparison
Open Charts CGIE vs UMMA
Capital Group International Equity ETF
Price$33.62
Change-$0.11 (-0.33%)
Volume$1.21K
Net AssetsN/A
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
Price$27.37
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
Volume$100
Net Assets157.29M
CGIE vs UMMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGIE vs. UMMA commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIE is a StrongBuy and UMMA is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGIE has a higher annual dividend yield than UMMA: CGIE (23.623) vs UMMA (16.175). CGIE was incepted earlier than UMMA: CGIE (2 years) vs UMMA (4 years). CGIE (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than UMMA (0.65). CGIE has a higher turnover UMMA (11.00) vs UMMA (11.00).
| CGIE | UMMA | CGIE / UMMA | |
| Gain YTD | 23.623 | 16.175 | 146% |
| Net Assets | N/A | 157M | - |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.65 | 83% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 11.00 | 200% |
| Yield | 1.07 | 0.83 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGIE | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 68% | 16 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGIE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGIE has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGIE jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGIE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGIE | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| BN - CGIE | 69% Closely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| SAP - CGIE | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| NWG - CGIE | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| ASML - CGIE | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| TSM - CGIE | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||
UMMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 75% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 67% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| BHP - UMMA | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| SAP - UMMA | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| CRH - UMMA | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
More | ||||