CGLCF
Price
$0.19
Change
+$0.01 (+5.56%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
26.97M
MAUTF
Price
$4.85
Change
-$0.24 (-4.72%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGLCF vs MAUTF

Header iconCGLCF vs MAUTF Comparison
Open Charts CGLCF vs MAUTFBanner chart's image
Cassiar Gold
Price$0.19
Change+$0.01 (+5.56%)
Volume$474.89K
Capitalization26.97M
Montage Gold
Price$4.85
Change-$0.24 (-4.72%)
Volume$107.81K
Capitalization1.83B
CGLCF vs MAUTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAUTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGLCF vs. MAUTF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGLCF is a Hold and MAUTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CGLCF: $0.19 vs. MAUTF: $4.85)
Brand notoriety: CGLCF and MAUTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGLCF: 138% vs. MAUTF: 148%
Market capitalization -- CGLCF: $26.97M vs. MAUTF: $1.83B
CGLCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $26.97M. MAUTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $107.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGLCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAUTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAUTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGLCF is a better buy in the long-term than MAUTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGLCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAUTF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGLCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MAUTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CGLCF and MAUTF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CGLCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.38% price change this week, while MAUTF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6092.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.13% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAUTF($1.83B) has a higher market cap than CGLCF($27M). MAUTF YTD gains are higher at: 232.055 vs. CGLCF (45.569). CGLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.75M vs. MAUTF (-74.46M). MAUTF has more cash in the bank: 99.9M vs. CGLCF (1.44M). CGLCF has less debt than MAUTF: CGLCF (0) vs MAUTF (361K). CGLCF (0) and MAUTF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CGLCFMAUTFCGLCF / MAUTF
Capitalization27M1.83B1%
EBITDA-7.75M-74.46M10%
Gain YTD45.569232.05520%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.44M99.9M1%
Total Debt0361K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGLCF: Fundamental Ratings
CGLCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGLCFMAUTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAUTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCRAX61.46N/A
N/A
American Century Growth A
CWVGX24.76N/A
N/A
Calvert International Equity A
GIRPX10.79N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts Inv
ESISX16.94N/A
N/A
Parametric International Equity R6
MMMMX45.29N/A
N/A
Victory Integrity Discovery Member

CGLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGLCF has been loosely correlated with STLRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGLCF jumps, then STLRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGLCF
1D Price
Change %
CGLCF100%
+3.41%
STLRF - CGLCF
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.94%
NSUPF - CGLCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-6.71%
PAAS - CGLCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
MAUTF - CGLCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.75%
WPM - CGLCF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
More

MAUTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAUTF has been loosely correlated with STLRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAUTF jumps, then STLRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAUTF
1D Price
Change %
MAUTF100%
-4.75%
STLRF - MAUTF
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.94%
AEM - MAUTF
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
AGI - MAUTF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
NFGC - MAUTF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
PAAS - MAUTF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
More