CGLCF
Price
$0.19
Change
+$0.01 (+5.56%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
26.97M
PAAS
Price
$38.48
Change
-$0.33 (-0.85%)
Updated
Sep 30, 01:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.17B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGLCF vs PAAS

Header iconCGLCF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts CGLCF vs PAASBanner chart's image
Cassiar Gold
Price$0.19
Change+$0.01 (+5.56%)
Volume$474.89K
Capitalization26.97M
Pan American Silver
Price$38.48
Change-$0.33 (-0.85%)
Volume$1.47K
Capitalization16.17B
CGLCF vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGLCF vs. PAAS commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGLCF is a Hold and PAAS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CGLCF: $0.19 vs. PAAS: $38.81)
Brand notoriety: CGLCF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGLCF: 138% vs. PAAS: 120%
Market capitalization -- CGLCF: $26.97M vs. PAAS: $16.17B
CGLCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $26.97M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $16.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $107.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGLCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CGLCF and PAAS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGLCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGLCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the short-term than CGLCF.

Price Growth

CGLCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.38% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6092.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.13% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($16.2B) has a higher market cap than CGLCF($27M). PAAS YTD gains are higher at: 94.317 vs. CGLCF (45.569). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. CGLCF (-7.75M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. CGLCF (1.44M). CGLCF has less debt than PAAS: CGLCF (0) vs PAAS (821M). PAAS has higher revenues than CGLCF: PAAS (3.12B) vs CGLCF (0).
CGLCFPAASCGLCF / PAAS
Capitalization27M16.2B0%
EBITDA-7.75M1.41B-1%
Gain YTD45.56994.31748%
P/E RatioN/A26.77-
Revenue03.12B-
Total Cash1.44M1.11B0%
Total Debt0821M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGLCF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
CGLCF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7622
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
9668
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (17) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGLCF (49) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGLCF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (68) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGLCF (96) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGLCF (47) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGLCF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGLCFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XTWY39.180.40
+1.03%
BondBloxx Bloomberg TwentyYrTrgDuUSTrETF
EWN57.670.55
+0.96%
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
DBMF27.280.11
+0.41%
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
ZDEK25.230.02
+0.06%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrDec
EFRA33.85N/A
N/A
iShares Environmental Infras & IndstrETF

CGLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGLCF has been loosely correlated with STLRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGLCF jumps, then STLRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGLCF
1D Price
Change %
CGLCF100%
+3.41%
STLRF - CGLCF
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.94%
NSUPF - CGLCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-6.71%
PAAS - CGLCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
MAUTF - CGLCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.75%
WPM - CGLCF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
More

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
+1.17%
AEM - PAAS
78%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
WPM - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
AGI - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
KGC - PAAS
76%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
CGAU - PAAS
76%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
More