CGLCF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
PAAS
Price
$20.65
Change
-$1.35 (-6.14%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
62 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CGLCF vs PAAS

Header iconCGLCF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts CGLCF vs PAASBanner chart's image
Cassiar Gold
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$68.3K
CapitalizationN/A
Pan American Silver
Price$20.65
Change-$1.35 (-6.14%)
Volume$4.74M
CapitalizationN/A
CGLCF vs PAAS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CGLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGLCF vs. PAAS commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGLCF is a Hold and PAAS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CGLCF: $0.14 vs. PAAS: $20.65)
Brand notoriety: CGLCF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGLCF: 45% vs. PAAS: 130%
Market capitalization -- CGLCF: $28.8M vs. PAAS: $5.59B
CGLCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $28.8M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGLCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGLCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than CGLCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGLCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGLCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGLCF is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

CGLCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.11% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was -13.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($5.59B) has a higher market cap than CGLCF($28.8M). PAAS YTD gains are higher at: 29.339 vs. CGLCF (-46.094). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. CGLCF (-3.3M). PAAS has higher revenues than CGLCF: PAAS (2.02B) vs CGLCF (0).
CGLCFPAASCGLCF / PAAS
Capitalization28.8M5.59B1%
EBITDA-3.3M296M-1%
Gain YTD-46.09429.339-157%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue02.02B-
Total Cash2.25MN/A-
Total Debt108KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGLCF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
CGLCF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5166
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10079
SMR RATING
1..100
9289
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (13) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGLCF (28) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGLCF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (89) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGLCF (92) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGLCF (84) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGLCF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGLCFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CGLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QMCO23.720.45
+1.93%
Quantum Corp
ARI9.06-0.06
-0.66%
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance
SCCO96.74-0.65
-0.67%
Southern Copper Corp
RMBS58.18-0.96
-1.62%
Rambus
SB3.57-0.06
-1.65%
Safe Bulkers

CGLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGLCF has been loosely correlated with STLRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGLCF jumps, then STLRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGLCF
1D Price
Change %
CGLCF100%
-3.57%
STLRF - CGLCF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
NSUPF - CGLCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
PAAS - CGLCF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
APGOF - CGLCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.85%
MAG - CGLCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More