CGMBF
Price
$0.41
Change
+$0.03 (+7.89%)
Updated
Dec 27 closing price
Capitalization
23.21B
CIBEY
Price
$1.49
Change
-$0.02 (-1.32%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.87B
Ad is loading...

CGMBF vs CIBEY

Header iconCGMBF vs CIBEY Comparison
Open Charts CGMBF vs CIBEYBanner chart's image
China Minsheng Banking
Price$0.41
Change+$0.03 (+7.89%)
Volume$1.1M
Capitalization23.21B
Commercial International Bank
Price$1.49
Change-$0.02 (-1.32%)
Volume$47.59K
Capitalization4.87B
CGMBF vs CIBEY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGMBF vs. CIBEY commentary
Apr 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMBF is a Hold and CIBEY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CGMBF: $0.41 vs. CIBEY: $1.49)
Brand notoriety: CGMBF and CIBEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGMBF: 100% vs. CIBEY: 166%
Market capitalization -- CGMBF: $23.21B vs. CIBEY: $4.87B
CGMBF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.21B. CIBEY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGMBF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCIBEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGMBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CIBEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGMBF is a better buy in the long-term than CIBEY.

Price Growth

CGMBF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIBEY (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-4.81% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMBF($23.2B) has a higher market cap than CIBEY($4.87B). CIBEY has higher P/E ratio than CGMBF: CIBEY (5.67) vs CGMBF (3.90). CIBEY YTD gains are higher at: 5.300 vs. CGMBF (0.000). CIBEY has less debt than CGMBF: CIBEY (14.2B) vs CGMBF (668B). CGMBF has higher revenues than CIBEY: CGMBF (143B) vs CIBEY (47.6B).
CGMBFCIBEYCGMBF / CIBEY
Capitalization23.2B4.87B476%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0005.300-
P/E Ratio3.905.6769%
Revenue143B47.6B300%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt668B14.2B4,704%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGMBF vs CIBEY: Fundamental Ratings
CGMBF
CIBEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1690
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGMBF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIBEY (96). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

CGMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBEY (100). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew similarly to CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

CGMBF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBEY (1). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew similarly to CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

CGMBF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBEY (52). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew similarly to CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

CGMBF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIBEY (90). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TBUX49.62-0.06
-0.13%
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
NOCT46.85-1.75
-3.60%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct
PSFD30.31-1.34
-4.24%
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF
BLKC17.23-0.81
-4.47%
Invesco Aln Glxy Blkh Usr&Dctrzd Cmr ETF
BBMC81.67-4.20
-4.89%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Eq ETF

CGMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMBF and KSBI have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMBF and KSBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGMBF
1D Price
Change %
CGMBF100%
N/A
KSBI - CGMBF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABBB - CGMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
CCBC - CGMBF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
CIBEY - CGMBF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
CIHKY - CGMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.12%
More

CIBEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIBEY and CCRDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIBEY and CCRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIBEY
1D Price
Change %
CIBEY100%
-1.16%
CCRDF - CIBEY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MZHOF - CIBEY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - CIBEY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGMBF - CIBEY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - CIBEY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More