CGMBF
Price
$0.46
Change
+$0.05 (+12.20%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
23.21B
CIBEY
Price
$1.65
Change
+$0.07 (+4.43%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.87B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGMBF vs CIBEY

Header iconCGMBF vs CIBEY Comparison
Open Charts CGMBF vs CIBEYBanner chart's image
China Minsheng Banking
Price$0.46
Change+$0.05 (+12.20%)
Volume$17.5K
Capitalization23.21B
Commercial International Bank
Price$1.65
Change+$0.07 (+4.43%)
Volume$46.34K
Capitalization4.87B
CGMBF vs CIBEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGMBF vs. CIBEY commentary
Jun 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMBF is a Hold and CIBEY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CGMBF: $0.46 vs. CIBEY: $1.58)
Brand notoriety: CGMBF and CIBEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGMBF: 154% vs. CIBEY: 8%
Market capitalization -- CGMBF: $23.21B vs. CIBEY: $4.87B
CGMBF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.21B. CIBEY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGMBF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCIBEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGMBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CIBEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGMBF is a better buy in the long-term than CIBEY.

Price Growth

CGMBF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIBEY (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIBEY is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.50% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMBF($23.2B) has a higher market cap than CIBEY($4.87B). CIBEY has higher P/E ratio than CGMBF: CIBEY (5.67) vs CGMBF (3.90). CIBEY YTD gains are higher at: 15.600 vs. CGMBF (11.961). CIBEY has less debt than CGMBF: CIBEY (14.2B) vs CGMBF (668B). CGMBF has higher revenues than CIBEY: CGMBF (143B) vs CIBEY (47.6B).
CGMBFCIBEYCGMBF / CIBEY
Capitalization23.2B4.87B476%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.96115.60077%
P/E Ratio3.905.6769%
Revenue143B47.6B300%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt668B14.2B4,704%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGMBF vs CIBEY: Fundamental Ratings
CGMBF
CIBEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4621
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1689
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGMBF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIBEY (100). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

CGMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBEY (100). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew similarly to CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

CGMBF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBEY (1). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew similarly to CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

CGMBF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBEY (47). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew similarly to CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

CGMBF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIBEY (89). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JANRX19.460.09
+0.46%
Janus Henderson Global Select D
FOCKX21.70N/A
N/A
Fidelity OTC K
GRETX11.55N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Inv
TISVX17.13N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Sm Cp Val I
GSXIX40.36N/A
N/A
abrdn US Small Cap Equity Inst Svc

CGMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMBF and KSBI have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMBF and KSBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGMBF
1D Price
Change %
CGMBF100%
N/A
KSBI - CGMBF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABBB - CGMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCBC - CGMBF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - CGMBF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
CIHKY - CGMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
More

CIBEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIBEY and CCRDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIBEY and CCRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIBEY
1D Price
Change %
CIBEY100%
-0.47%
CCRDF - CIBEY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MZHOF - CIBEY
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.52%
CHBAF - CIBEY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGMBF - CIBEY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - CIBEY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More