CGMLF
Price
$1.15
Change
+$0.10 (+9.52%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.55B
CVVUF
Price
$0.63
Change
+$0.01 (+1.61%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
28.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGMLF vs CVVUF

Header iconCGMLF vs CVVUF Comparison
Open Charts CGMLF vs CVVUFBanner chart's image
Chalice Mining
Price$1.15
Change+$0.10 (+9.52%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization1.55B
CanAlaska Uranium
Price$0.63
Change+$0.01 (+1.61%)
Volume$34.92K
Capitalization28.71M
CGMLF vs CVVUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CVVUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGMLF vs. CVVUF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMLF is a Buy and CVVUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CGMLF: $1.15 vs. CVVUF: $0.63)
Brand notoriety: CGMLF and CVVUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGMLF: 12% vs. CVVUF: 58%
Market capitalization -- CGMLF: $1.55B vs. CVVUF: $28.71M
CGMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.55B. CVVUF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $28.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCVVUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CVVUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVVUF is a better buy in the long-term than CGMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVVUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CVVUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGMLF is a better buy in the short-term than CVVUF.

Price Growth

CGMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +9.52% price change this week, while CVVUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

CVVUF is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMLF($1.55B) has a higher market cap than CVVUF($28.7M). CGMLF YTD gains are higher at: 81.102 vs. CVVUF (26.185). CVVUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.37M vs. CGMLF (-70.16M). CGMLF has more cash in the bank: 115M vs. CVVUF (20.9M). CGMLF has less debt than CVVUF: CGMLF (349K) vs CVVUF (866K). CGMLF has higher revenues than CVVUF: CGMLF (125K) vs CVVUF (0).
CGMLFCVVUFCGMLF / CVVUF
Capitalization1.55B28.7M5,397%
EBITDA-70.16M-6.37M1,101%
Gain YTD81.10226.185310%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue125K0-
Total Cash115M20.9M550%
Total Debt349K866K40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGMLF vs CVVUF: Fundamental Ratings
CGMLF
CVVUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3415
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9237
SMR RATING
1..100
9397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CVVUF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (96). This means that CVVUF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CVVUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGMLF (92). This means that CVVUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CVVUF (97). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to CVVUF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CVVUF (42). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to CVVUF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CVVUF (100). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to CVVUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGMLFCVVUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CVVUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JLGAX20.890.24
+1.16%
JAG Large Cap Growth A
MERAX15.36N/A
N/A
Madison Mid Cap A
NFACX32.26N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Focus C
JMGZX46.62N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R2
DESGX23.83N/A
N/A
DWS ESG Core Equity Institutional

CGMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMLF and NAK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMLF and NAK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGMLF
1D Price
Change %
CGMLF100%
N/A
NAK - CGMLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
CVVUF - CGMLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
PMETF - CGMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
GLNCY - CGMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
ATOXF - CGMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
More