Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGMS vs DBL
CGMS vs DBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGMS vs. DBL commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMS is a Buy and DBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMS has more net assets: 3.32B vs. DBL (294M). CGMS (6.555) and DBL (6.540) have matching annual dividend yield . CGMS was incepted earlier than DBL: CGMS (3 years) vs DBL (14 years). CGMS (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than DBL (1.98). CGMS has a higher turnover DBL (27.00) vs DBL (27.00).
| CGMS | DBL | CGMS / DBL | |
| Gain YTD | 6.555 | 6.540 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 294M | 1,130% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.98 | 20% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 27.00 | 144% |
| Yield | 5.85 | 6.41 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGMS | DBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ACV | 24.05 | 0.09 | +0.38% |
| Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund | |||
| VTWG | 229.67 | 0.14 | +0.06% |
| Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | |||
| QDCC | 24.36 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend Covered Call ETF | |||
| BSTP | 36.09 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF | |||
| PSC | 56.31 | -0.20 | -0.35% |
| Principal US Small Cap ETF | |||
CGMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMS and DBD have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMS and DBD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMS | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| DBD - CGMS | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| NFE - CGMS | 19% Poorly correlated | +44.93% |