Ad is loading...
CGMS vs FSCO
CGMS vs FSCO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGMS vs. FSCO commentary
May 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMS is a Hold and FSCO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMS has more net assets: 2.55B vs. FSCO (1.41B). FSCO has a higher annual dividend yield than CGMS: FSCO (7.307) vs CGMS (0.565). CGMS was incepted earlier than FSCO: CGMS (3 years) vs FSCO (2 years). CGMS has a higher turnover FSCO (36.00) vs FSCO (36.00).
| CGMS | FSCO | CGMS / FSCO | |
| Gain YTD | 0.565 | 7.307 | 8% |
| Net Assets | 2.55B | 1.41B | 181% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 36.00 | 108% |
| Yield | 5.90 | 8.78 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGMS | FSCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 27% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 24 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 19% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SEEIX | 12.72 | 0.26 | +2.09% |
| SEI International Equity I (SIT) | |||
| JGLTX | 20.48 | 0.40 | +1.99% |
| Janus Henderson VIT Glb Tech&Innvt Instl | |||
| AMRMX | 56.08 | 0.83 | +1.50% |
| American Funds American Mutual A | |||
| DMCYX | 29.12 | 0.43 | +1.50% |
| BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Y | |||
| TSAMX | 13.06 | 0.12 | +0.93% |
| Thornburg Summit A | |||
CGMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMS and DBD have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMS and DBD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMS | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| DBD - CGMS | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.31% | ||
| NFE - CGMS | 21% Poorly correlated | +7.04% |