Ad is loading...
CGPAX vs MNHIX
CGPAX vs MNHIX Comparison
Open Charts CGPAX vs MNHIX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529A
Price$24.15
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.63B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term I
Price$24.64
Change-$0.13 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets449.02M
CGPAX vs MNHIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPAX vs. MNHIX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPAX is a Hold and MNHIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPAX has more cash in the bank: 19.6B vs. MNHIX (449M). MNHIX pays higher dividends than CGPAX: MNHIX (0.81) vs CGPAX (0.42). CGPAX was incepted earlier than MNHIX: CGPAX (13 years) vs MNHIX (17 years). MNHIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CGPAX (0.77). CGPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHIX: CGPAX (250) vs MNHIX (1000000). MNHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.50 vs. CGPAX (1.33). CGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.29 vs. MNHIX (26.06).
| CGPAX | MNHIX | CGPAX / MNHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.86 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.94 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.659 | -1.315 | 354% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.6B | 449M | 4,365% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.81 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | 1.50 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.53 | 2.99 | 419% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.29 | 26.06 | 254% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.06 | -8.26 | -812% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...