Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPAX vs MNHIX
CGPAX vs MNHIX Comparison
Open Charts CGPAX vs MNHIX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529A
Price$26.65
Change-$0.10 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.79B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term I
Price$25.60
Change-$0.11 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets453.26M
CGPAX vs MNHIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPAX vs. MNHIX commentary
Jun 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPAX is a Hold and MNHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPAX has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. MNHIX (453M). MNHIX pays higher dividends than CGPAX: MNHIX (0.81) vs CGPAX (0.41). CGPAX was incepted earlier than MNHIX: CGPAX (13 years) vs MNHIX (17 years). MNHIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than CGPAX (0.77). CGPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHIX: CGPAX (250) vs MNHIX (1000000). CGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. MNHIX (2.03). CGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.82 vs. MNHIX (3.38).
| CGPAX | MNHIX | CGPAX / MNHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.86 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.211 | 1.992 | 262% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.8B | 453M | 4,812% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.81 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | 2.03 | 319% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.38 | 15.82 | 268% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.82 | 3.38 | 1,266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.25 | -9.11 | -804% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers