Ad is loading...
CGPAX vs MNHIX
CGPAX vs MNHIX Comparison
Open Charts CGPAX vs MNHIX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529A
Price$22.99
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.76B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term I
Price$23.50
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets422.38M
CGPAX vs MNHIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPAX vs. MNHIX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPAX is a Hold and MNHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPAX has more cash in the bank: 18.8B vs. MNHIX (422M). MNHIX pays higher dividends than CGPAX: MNHIX (0.85) vs CGPAX (0.44). CGPAX was incepted earlier than MNHIX: CGPAX (13 years) vs MNHIX (17 years). MNHIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CGPAX (0.77). CGPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHIX: CGPAX (250) vs MNHIX (1000000). MNHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.25 vs. CGPAX (-1.56). CGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.71 vs. MNHIX (4.59).
| CGPAX | MNHIX | CGPAX / MNHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.86 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.94 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.238 | -6.375 | 145% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.8B | 422M | 4,455% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.85 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.56 | -1.25 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.01 | -6.80 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.71 | 4.59 | 822% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.51 | -15.65 | -342% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers