Ad is loading...
CGPAX vs MNHIX
CGPAX vs MNHIX Comparison
Open Charts CGPAX vs MNHIX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529A
Price$26.43
Change-$0.09 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.48B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term I
Price$26.17
Change-$0.07 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets482.28M
CGPAX vs MNHIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPAX vs. MNHIX commentary
Feb 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPAX is a Hold and MNHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPAX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. MNHIX (482M). MNHIX pays higher dividends than CGPAX: MNHIX (0.87) vs CGPAX (0.60). CGPAX was incepted earlier than MNHIX: CGPAX (13 years) vs MNHIX (17 years). MNHIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGPAX (1.00). CGPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHIX: CGPAX (250) vs MNHIX (1000000). CGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.67 vs. MNHIX (10.27). CGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.80 vs. MNHIX (7.11).
| CGPAX | MNHIX | CGPAX / MNHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.698 | 3.944 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 482M | 4,461% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.87 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.67 | 10.27 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.13 | -0.77 | -1,571% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.80 | 7.11 | 602% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.00 | -2.33 | -3,769% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...