Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs EXHAX
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs EXHAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$28.75
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.42B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$26.73
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets470.17M
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. EXHAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and EXHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 23.4B vs. EXHAX (470M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: EXHAX (0.59) vs CGPFX (0.55). CGPFX was incepted earlier than EXHAX: CGPFX (13 years) vs EXHAX (30 years). EXHAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.80). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: CGPFX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.38 vs. EXHAX (5.70). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.69 vs. EXHAX (19.89).
| CGPFX | EXHAX | CGPFX / EXHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.10 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.10 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 7.006 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.4B | 470M | 4,979% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.59 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.38 | 5.70 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.39 | 16.87 | 287% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.69 | 19.89 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.99 | 45.75 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement