Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs EXHAX
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs EXHAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$26.54
Change+$0.17 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.42B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$25.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets456.55M
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. EXHAX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and EXHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 21.4B vs. EXHAX (457M). EXHAX (0.61) and CGPFX (0.59) have matching dividends . CGPFX was incepted earlier than EXHAX: CGPFX (13 years) vs EXHAX (30 years). EXHAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.80). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: CGPFX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. EXHAX (4.53). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.54 vs. EXHAX (17.81).
| CGPFX | EXHAX | CGPFX / EXHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.10 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.10 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.242 | 2.082 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.4B | 457M | 4,683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.61 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.15 | 4.53 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.63 | 7.47 | 397% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.54 | 17.81 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.11 | 36.26 | 218% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers