Ad is loading...
CGPFX vs EXHAX
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs EXHAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$23.32
Change-$1.20 (-4.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.83B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$23.71
Change-$0.87 (-3.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.89M
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. EXHAX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and EXHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. EXHAX (445M). CGPFX (0.64) and EXHAX (0.64) have matching dividends . CGPFX was incepted earlier than EXHAX: CGPFX (13 years) vs EXHAX (29 years). EXHAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.80). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: CGPFX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). EXHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.76 vs. CGPFX (0.47). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 69.65 vs. EXHAX (42.18).
| CGPFX | EXHAX | CGPFX / EXHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.11 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.692 | -1.601 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8B | 445M | 4,449% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.64 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.47 | 0.76 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.71 | -6.66 | -56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.65 | 42.18 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.54 | 31.69 | 216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...