Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs EXHAX
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs EXHAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$30.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.59B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$27.12
Change+$0.06 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets461.99M
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. EXHAX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and EXHAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 24.6B vs. EXHAX (462M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: EXHAX (0.58) vs CGPFX (0.52). CGPFX was incepted earlier than EXHAX: CGPFX (13 years) vs EXHAX (30 years). EXHAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.80). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: CGPFX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.19 vs. EXHAX (2.68). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.91 vs. EXHAX (18.14).
| CGPFX | EXHAX | CGPFX / EXHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.10 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.10 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.382 | 8.327 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.6B | 462M | 5,325% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.58 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.19 | 2.68 | 566% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | 24.18 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.91 | 18.14 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.00 | 57.58 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers