Ad is loading...
CGPFX vs EXHAX
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs EXHAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$24.32
Change+$0.19 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.59B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$24.32
Change+$0.10 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.79M
CGPFX vs EXHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. EXHAX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and EXHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 19.6B vs. EXHAX (437M). CGPFX (0.64) and EXHAX (0.64) have matching dividends . CGPFX was incepted earlier than EXHAX: CGPFX (13 years) vs EXHAX (30 years). EXHAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.80). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: CGPFX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.57 vs. EXHAX (1.90). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.43 vs. EXHAX (25.66).
| CGPFX | EXHAX | CGPFX / EXHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.11 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.478 | -3.042 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.6B | 437M | 4,485% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.64 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | 1.90 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.44 | -0.40 | -4,067% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.43 | 25.66 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.62 | 27.50 | 231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers