Ad is loading...
CGQGX vs EXHAX
CGQGX vs EXHAX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs EXHAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$23.16
Change-$1.19 (-4.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.83B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$23.71
Change-$0.87 (-3.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.89M
CGQGX vs EXHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. EXHAX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and EXHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. EXHAX (445M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than CGQGX: EXHAX (0.64) vs CGQGX (0.54). CGQGX was incepted earlier than EXHAX: CGQGX (7 years) vs EXHAX (29 years). EXHAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: CGQGX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). EXHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.76 vs. CGQGX (0.34). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 68.85 vs. EXHAX (42.18).
| CGQGX | EXHAX | CGQGX / EXHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.11 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.17 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.679 | -1.601 | 230% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8B | 445M | 4,449% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.64 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.34 | 0.76 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.40 | -6.66 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.85 | 42.18 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 31.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...