Ad is loading...
CGQGX vs MNHCX
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$27.43
Change+$0.25 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$25.43
Change+$0.18 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHCX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 20.8B vs. MNHCX (470M). CGQGX pays higher dividends than MNHCX: CGQGX (0.70) vs MNHCX (0.19). CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHCX: CGQGX (6 years) vs MNHCX (15 years). MNHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGQGX (1.00). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.68 vs. MNHCX (7.16). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.51 vs. MNHCX (1.11).
| CGQGX | MNHCX | CGQGX / MNHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.336 | 6.568 | 355% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.8B | 470M | 4,426% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.19 | 362% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.68 | 7.16 | 317% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.98 | -10.36 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.51 | 1.11 | 3,553% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -11.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers