Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGQGX vs MNHCX
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$26.76
Change+$0.19 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.74B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$25.76
Change+$0.16 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets460.01M
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. MNHCX (460M). CGQGX pays higher dividends than MNHCX: CGQGX (0.50) vs MNHCX (0.20). CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHCX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHCX (15 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. MNHCX (2.72). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 43.40 vs. MNHCX (-0.49).
| CGQGX | MNHCX | CGQGX / MNHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.82 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.82 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.854 | 2.646 | 221% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7B | 460M | 4,717% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.20 | 249% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.97 | 2.72 | 330% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.66 | 5.14 | 577% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.40 | -0.49 | -8,870% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -10.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers