Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGQGX vs MNHCX
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$28.93
Change+$0.27 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.57B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$26.53
Change+$0.15 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets461.83M
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. MNHCX (462M). CGQGX pays higher dividends than MNHCX: CGQGX (0.46) vs MNHCX (0.19). CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHCX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHCX (16 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.61 vs. MNHCX (1.04). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 42.98 vs. MNHCX (-2.85).
| CGQGX | MNHCX | CGQGX / MNHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.82 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.82 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.438 | 5.774 | 250% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.6B | 462M | 5,108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.19 | 237% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.61 | 1.04 | 1,504% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.58 | 15.36 | 323% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.98 | -2.85 | -1,506% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement