Ad is loading...
CGQGX vs MNHCX
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$23.48
Change+$1.95 (+9.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.55B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$23.65
Change+$1.64 (+7.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets399.12M
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHCX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 17.6B vs. MNHCX (399M). CGQGX pays higher dividends than MNHCX: CGQGX (0.54) vs MNHCX (0.21). CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHCX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHCX (15 years). MNHCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). MNHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.46 vs. CGQGX (-11.43). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. MNHCX (-1.17).
| CGQGX | MNHCX | CGQGX / MNHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.86 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.834 | -11.748 | 126% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.6B | 399M | 4,411% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.21 | 259% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.43 | -10.46 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.00 | -16.30 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.19 | -1.17 | -3,017% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -24.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...