Ad is loading...
CGQGX vs MNHCX
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$25.98
Change-$0.54 (-2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.13B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$25.63
Change-$0.34 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets470.98M
CGQGX vs MNHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. MNHCX (471M). CGQGX pays higher dividends than MNHCX: CGQGX (0.70) vs MNHCX (0.19). CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHCX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHCX (15 years). MNHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGQGX (1.00). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.27 vs. MNHCX (5.33). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.81 vs. MNHCX (-0.67).
| CGQGX | MNHCX | CGQGX / MNHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.769 | 2.767 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1B | 471M | 4,480% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.19 | 362% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.27 | 5.33 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.19 | -0.07 | -23,179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.81 | -0.67 | -5,315% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -12.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...