Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGQGX vs MNHRX
CGQGX vs MNHRX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHRX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$29.31
Change-$0.26 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.34B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$26.58
Change-$0.17 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets458.17M
CGQGX vs MNHRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHRX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. MNHRX (458M). MNHRX (0.46) and CGQGX (0.46) have matching dividends . CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHRX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHRX (15 years). MNHRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.96 vs. MNHRX (0.77). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.93 vs. MNHRX (8.13).
| CGQGX | MNHRX | CGQGX / MNHRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.30 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.941 | 6.701 | 238% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 458M | 5,306% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.46 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.96 | 0.77 | 1,552% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.98 | 26.63 | 237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | 8.13 | 589% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers