Ad is loading...
CGQGX vs MNHRX
CGQGX vs MNHRX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHRX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$24.95
Change+$0.16 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.28B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.01
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets447.12M
CGQGX vs MNHRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHRX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 20.3B vs. MNHRX (447M). CGQGX pays higher dividends than MNHRX: CGQGX (0.53) vs MNHRX (0.50). CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHRX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHRX (15 years). MNHRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.96 vs. MNHRX (2.07). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.43 vs. MNHRX (13.97).
| CGQGX | MNHRX | CGQGX / MNHRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.30 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.305 | -0.598 | 218% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.3B | 447M | 4,541% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.50 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.96 | 2.07 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.42 | 8.47 | 336% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.43 | 13.97 | 325% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers