Ad is loading...
CGQGX vs MNHRX
CGQGX vs MNHRX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHRX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$23.35
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.04B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$23.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets427.24M
CGQGX vs MNHRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHRX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 19B vs. MNHRX (427M). CGQGX pays higher dividends than MNHRX: CGQGX (0.54) vs MNHRX (0.50). CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHRX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHRX (15 years). MNHRX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.52 vs. MNHRX (-0.91). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.49 vs. MNHRX (13.93).
| CGQGX | MNHRX | CGQGX / MNHRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.33 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.634 | -5.425 | 141% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19B | 427M | 4,450% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.50 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.52 | -0.91 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.80 | -7.58 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.49 | 13.93 | 319% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...