Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGQGX vs MNHRX
CGQGX vs MNHRX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHRX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$26.62
Change-$0.10 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.79B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.50
Change-$0.12 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets453.26M
CGQGX vs MNHRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHRX commentary
Jun 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. MNHRX (453M). CGQGX (0.50) and MNHRX (0.48) have matching dividends . CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHRX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHRX (15 years). MNHRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). CGQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: CGQGX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. MNHRX (1.54). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 43.93 vs. MNHRX (8.54).
| CGQGX | MNHRX | CGQGX / MNHRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.30 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.301 | 1.715 | 309% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.8B | 453M | 4,812% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.48 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 1.54 | 427% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.02 | 14.18 | 303% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.93 | 8.54 | 514% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement