Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGQGX vs MNHWX
CGQGX vs MNHWX Comparison
Open Charts CGQGX vs MNHWX
American Funds Growth Portfolio ABLE-A
Price$28.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.23B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term W
Price$26.61
Change-$0.07 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets459.19M
CGQGX vs MNHWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGQGX vs. MNHWX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGQGX is a Hold and MNHWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGQGX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. MNHWX (459M). MNHWX pays higher dividends than CGQGX: MNHWX (1.06) vs CGQGX (0.46). CGQGX was incepted earlier than MNHWX: CGQGX (7 years) vs MNHWX (6 years). MNHWX (0.78) is less costly to investors than CGQGX (0.68). MNHWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGQGX: MNHWX (0) vs CGQGX (250). CGQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. MNHWX (6.08). CGQGX return over 5 years is better than : 42.10 vs. MNHWX (20.78).
| CGQGX | MNHWX | CGQGX / MNHWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.10 | 630% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.78 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.867 | 5.538 | 214% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.2B | 459M | 5,054% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.06 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 6.08 | 324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.09 | 12.09 | 307% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.10 | 20.78 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers