CGSHY
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.01 (-1.41%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
XIN
Price
$2.27
Change
-$0.23 (-9.20%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

CGSHY vs XIN

Header iconCGSHY vs XIN Comparison
Open Charts CGSHY vs XINBanner chart's image
Country Garden Svcs
Price$0.70
Change-$0.01 (-1.41%)
Volume$14.12K
CapitalizationN/A
Xinyuan Real Estate
Price$2.27
Change-$0.23 (-9.20%)
Volume$31.57K
CapitalizationN/A
CGSHY vs XIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
CGSHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGSHY vs. XIN commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGSHY is a Sell and XIN is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CGSHY: $0.70 vs. XIN: $2.27)
Brand notoriety: CGSHY and XIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGSHY: 278% vs. XIN: 109%
Market capitalization -- CGSHY: $3.8B vs. XIN: $16.28M
CGSHY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $3.8B. XIN’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $16.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGSHY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGSHY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CGSHY and XIN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGSHY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGSHY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • XIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGSHY is a better buy in the short-term than XIN.

Price Growth

CGSHY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XIN (@Real Estate Development) price change was -14.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

XIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 29, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.66% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGSHY($3.8B) has a higher market cap than XIN($16.3M). CGSHY YTD gains are higher at: -6.167 vs. XIN (-16.544). CGSHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.57B vs. XIN (208M). CGSHY has higher revenues than XIN: CGSHY (41.4B) vs XIN (1.97B).
CGSHYXINCGSHY / XIN
Capitalization3.8B16.3M23,301%
EBITDA5.57B208M2,677%
Gain YTD-6.167-16.54437%
P/E Ratio12.82N/A-
Revenue41.4B1.97B2,099%
Total CashN/A1.09B-
Total DebtN/A3.38B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
XIN: Fundamental Ratings
XIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGSHYXIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CGSHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

CGSHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGSHY has been loosely correlated with LGFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGSHY jumps, then LGFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGSHY
1D Price
Change %
CGSHY100%
N/A
LGFRY - CGSHY
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
CAOVY - CGSHY
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.16%
HLPPY - CGSHY
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
DUO - CGSHY
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
XIN - CGSHY
43%
Loosely correlated
-9.20%
More

XIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XIN has been loosely correlated with DUO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XIN jumps, then DUO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XIN
1D Price
Change %
XIN100%
-9.20%
DUO - XIN
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
LGFRY - XIN
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
CGSHY - XIN
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BEKE - XIN
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
XHG - XIN
35%
Loosely correlated
-28.58%
More