Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGV vs DDLS
CGV vs DDLS Comparison
Open Charts CGV vs DDLS
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
Price$13.32
Change+$0.12 (+0.91%)
Volume$31.76K
Net Assets111.51M
WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF
Price$38.29
Change+$0.39 (+1.03%)
Volume$27.15K
Net Assets419.04M
CGV vs DDLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGV vs. DDLS commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGV is a Buy and DDLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DDLS has more net assets: 419M vs. CGV (112M). DDLS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGV: DDLS (9.840) vs CGV (6.671). CGV was incepted earlier than DDLS: CGV (9 years) vs DDLS (9 years). DDLS (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than CGV (1.25). CGV has a higher turnover DDLS (37.00) vs DDLS (37.00).
| CGV | DDLS | CGV / DDLS | |
| Gain YTD | 6.671 | 9.840 | 68% |
| Net Assets | 112M | 419M | 27% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.48 | 260% |
| Turnover | 103.00 | 37.00 | 278% |
| Yield | 3.18 | 3.61 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGV | DDLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGV has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGV jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGV | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| APAM - CGV | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.07% | ||
| PRU - CGV | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| AMG - CGV | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| SBH - CGV | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| ACDC - CGV | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
More | ||||
DDLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDLS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDLS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDLS | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| MT - DDLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| VNT - DDLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| DOW - DDLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| GEN - DDLS | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| DOV - DDLS | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||