Ad is loading...
CGV vs FNDC
CGV vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts CGV vs FNDC
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
Price$11.74
Change-$0.24 (-2.00%)
Volume$300
Net Assets94.46M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$34.70
Change-$0.45 (-1.28%)
Volume$799
Net Assets2.93B
CGV vs FNDC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGV vs. FNDC commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGV is a Hold and FNDC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.93B vs. CGV (94.5M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than CGV: FNDC (2.958) vs CGV (-4.060). CGV was incepted earlier than FNDC: CGV (9 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than CGV (1.25). CGV has a higher turnover FNDC (22.00) vs FNDC (22.00).
| CGV | FNDC | CGV / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | -4.060 | 2.958 | -137% |
| Net Assets | 94.5M | 2.93B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.39 | 321% |
| Turnover | 103.00 | 22.00 | 468% |
| Yield | 3.27 | 3.40 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGV | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 74% | 17 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGV has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGV jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGV | 100% | +6.67% | ||
| APAM - CGV | 67% Closely correlated | +9.72% | ||
| PRU - CGV | 58% Loosely correlated | +9.24% | ||
| AMG - CGV | 53% Loosely correlated | +11.50% | ||
| ACDC - CGV | 52% Loosely correlated | +22.97% | ||
| SBH - CGV | 51% Loosely correlated | +6.54% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +6.61% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 73% Closely correlated | +12.77% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | +14.91% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +17.10% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +9.63% | ||
| ERO - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +10.67% | ||
More | ||||