Ad is loading...
CGV vs FNDC
CGV vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts CGV vs FNDC
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
Price$12.90
Change-$0.08 (-0.62%)
Volume$5.77K
Net Assets108.25M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$38.48
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
Volume$101.79K
Net Assets2.77B
CGV vs FNDC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGV vs. FNDC commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGV is a Buy and FNDC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.77B vs. CGV (108M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than CGV: FNDC (12.712) vs CGV (3.348). CGV was incepted earlier than FNDC: CGV (9 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than CGV (1.25). CGV has a higher turnover FNDC (22.00) vs FNDC (22.00).
| CGV | FNDC | CGV / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 3.348 | 12.712 | 26% |
| Net Assets | 108M | 2.77B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.39 | 321% |
| Turnover | 103.00 | 22.00 | 468% |
| Yield | 3.18 | 3.22 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGV | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGV has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGV jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGV | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| APAM - CGV | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.08% | ||
| PRU - CGV | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| AMG - CGV | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.39% | ||
| ACDC - CGV | 51% Loosely correlated | -5.81% | ||
| SBH - CGV | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.99% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 72% Closely correlated | +4.11% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +6.73% | ||
| ERO - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
More | ||||