Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGV vs FNDC
CGV vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts CGV vs FNDC
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
Price$14.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.43%)
Volume$1.63K
Net Assets119.19M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$43.63
Change+$0.13 (+0.30%)
Volume$172.53K
Net Assets3.03B
CGV vs FNDC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGV vs. FNDC commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGV is a Buy and FNDC is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3.03B vs. CGV (119M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than CGV: FNDC (28.399) vs CGV (15.311). CGV was incepted earlier than FNDC: CGV (9 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than CGV (1.25). CGV has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| CGV | FNDC | CGV / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 15.311 | 28.399 | 54% |
| Net Assets | 119M | 3.03B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.39 | 321% |
| Turnover | 103.00 | 33.00 | 312% |
| Yield | 3.43 | 2.76 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGV | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 70% | 17 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| ING - FNDC | 69% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| FER - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| MFG - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
More | ||||