Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGV vs FNDC
CGV vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts CGV vs FNDC
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
Price$13.61
Change-$0.08 (-0.58%)
Volume$13.87K
Net Assets114.66M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$40.88
Change-$0.47 (-1.14%)
Volume$100.7K
Net Assets2.87B
CGV vs FNDC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGV vs. FNDC commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGV is a Buy and FNDC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.87B vs. CGV (115M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than CGV: FNDC (19.742) vs CGV (9.004). CGV was incepted earlier than FNDC: CGV (9 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than CGV (1.25). CGV has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| CGV | FNDC | CGV / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 9.004 | 19.742 | 46% |
| Net Assets | 115M | 2.87B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.39 | 321% |
| Turnover | 103.00 | 33.00 | 312% |
| Yield | 3.07 | 3.05 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGV | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 71% | 25 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGV has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGV jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGV | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| APAM - CGV | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| PRU - CGV | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| AMG - CGV | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| SBH - CGV | 51% Loosely correlated | -5.25% | ||
| UPBD - CGV | 48% Loosely correlated | -5.64% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 72% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| ERO - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.08% | ||
More | ||||