Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGWRX vs RGACX
CGWRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CGWRX vs RGACX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth R
Price$77.41
Change+$0.24 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.59
Change-$0.14 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
CGWRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGWRX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGWRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. CGWRX (6.4B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CGWRX: RGACX (0.07) vs CGWRX (0.00). CGWRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CGWRX (15 years) vs RGACX (23 years). CGWRX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). CGWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). CGWRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CGWRX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.28 vs. CGWRX (14.46). CGWRX return over 5 years is better than : 53.26 vs. RGACX (46.76).
| CGWRX | RGACX | CGWRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.94 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.94 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.205 | 17.502 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.46 | 17.28 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.69 | 58.54 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.26 | 46.76 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.49 | 98.36 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers