CGXEF vs CNPRF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXEF is a Hold and CNPRF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGXEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNPRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CGXEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CNPRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CGXEF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +0.82% price change this week, while CNPRF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -5.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.36%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-1.25% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| CGXEF | CNPRF | CGXEF / CNPRF | |
| Capitalization | 329M | 83.6M | 394% |
| EBITDA | -3.84M | -7.16M | 54% |
| Gain YTD | 2.923 | 5.574 | 52% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 1.16M | - |
| Total Cash | 5.69M | 2.09M | 273% |
| Total Debt | 52.3M | 0 | - |
CGXEF | CNPRF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNPRF's Valuation (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CGXEF (93). This means that CNPRF’s stock grew similarly to CGXEF’s over the last 12 months.
CNPRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGXEF (100). This means that CNPRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGXEF’s over the last 12 months.
CGXEF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CNPRF (100). This means that CGXEF’s stock grew similarly to CNPRF’s over the last 12 months.
CNPRF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CGXEF (89). This means that CNPRF’s stock grew similarly to CGXEF’s over the last 12 months.
CGXEF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNPRF (47). This means that CGXEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNPRF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
CGXEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXEF has been loosely correlated with FECCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGXEF jumps, then FECCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXEF | 100% | -2.38% | ||
| FECCF - CGXEF | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| EWPMF - CGXEF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CNNEF - CGXEF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| BEPTF - CGXEF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CNPRF - CGXEF | -0% Poorly correlated | -3.16% | ||
More | ||||
CNPRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CNPRF and BEPTF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNPRF and BEPTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNPRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNPRF | 100% | -3.16% | ||
| BEPTF - CNPRF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CDDRF - CNPRF | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.07% | ||
| CGXEF - CNPRF | -0% Poorly correlated | -2.38% | ||
| BLMC - CNPRF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CRLFF - CNPRF | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||