Ad is loading...
CGXU vs FICS
CGXU vs FICS Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs FICS
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$25.73
Change-$0.50 (-1.91%)
Volume$675.81K
Net Assets3.43B
First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF
Price$36.46
Change-$0.22 (-0.60%)
Volume$12.33K
Net Assets179.48M
CGXU vs FICS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. FICS commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and FICS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.43B vs. FICS (179M). FICS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: FICS (7.378) vs CGXU (4.297). CGXU was incepted earlier than FICS: CGXU (3 years) vs FICS (4 years).
| CGXU | FICS | CGXU / FICS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.297 | 7.378 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 3.43B | 179M | 1,916% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | N/A | 59.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.92 | 0.98 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | FICS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 83% | 20 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -1.91% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 73% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.80% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| WDS - CGXU | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.05% | ||
More | ||||
FICS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICS has been closely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FICS jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FICS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FICS | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| SLF - FICS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| BMO - FICS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| TD - FICS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| SAN - FICS | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BHP - FICS | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
More | ||||