Ad is loading...
CGXU vs FICS
CGXU vs FICS Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs FICS
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$24.38
Change+$0.31 (+1.29%)
Volume$220
Net Assets3.2B
First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF
Price$38.05
Change+$0.39 (+1.04%)
Volume$2.36K
Net Assets190.8M
CGXU vs FICS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. FICS commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Buy and FICS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.2B vs. FICS (191M). FICS has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: FICS (11.356) vs CGXU (-2.432). CGXU was incepted earlier than FICS: CGXU (3 years) vs FICS (4 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than FICS (0.70). FICS has a higher turnover CGXU (36.00) vs CGXU (36.00).
| CGXU | FICS | CGXU / FICS | |
| Gain YTD | -2.432 | 11.356 | -21% |
| Net Assets | 3.2B | 191M | 1,676% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.70 | 77% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 58.00 | 62% |
| Yield | 1.02 | 2.12 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | FICS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 83% | 18 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +1.91% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 73% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 70% Closely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| RIO - CGXU | 67% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.56% | ||
More | ||||
FICS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICS has been closely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FICS jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FICS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FICS | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| SLF - FICS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| BMO - FICS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| TD - FICS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| SAN - FICS | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| RIO - FICS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
More | ||||