Ad is loading...
CGXU vs FICS
CGXU vs FICS Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs FICS
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$25.13
Change+$0.10 (+0.40%)
Volume$589.63K
Net Assets3.18B
First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF
Price$34.22
Change+$0.15 (+0.44%)
Volume$20.51K
Net Assets161.98M
CGXU vs FICS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. FICS commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and FICS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.18B vs. FICS (162M). CGXU has a higher annual dividend yield than FICS: CGXU (1.865) vs FICS (0.781). CGXU was incepted earlier than FICS: CGXU (3 years) vs FICS (4 years).
| CGXU | FICS | CGXU / FICS | |
| Gain YTD | 1.865 | 0.781 | 239% |
| Net Assets | 3.18B | 162M | 1,960% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | N/A | 59.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.92 | 0.98 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | FICS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 11 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 84% | 13 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 73% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.18% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| WDS - CGXU | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||
FICS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICS has been closely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FICS jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FICS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FICS | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| SLF - FICS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| BMO - FICS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| TD - FICS | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.96% | ||
| SAN - FICS | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BHP - FICS | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||