CGXYY
Price
$21.30
Change
-$1.98 (-8.51%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
14.46B
CIIHY
Price
$20.98
Change
-$4.52 (-17.73%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
46.09B
Ad is loading...

CGXYY vs CIIHY

Header iconCGXYY vs CIIHY Comparison
Open Charts CGXYY vs CIIHYBanner chart's image
China Galaxy Securities
Price$21.30
Change-$1.98 (-8.51%)
Volume$137
Capitalization14.46B
Citic Securities
Price$20.98
Change-$4.52 (-17.73%)
Volume$639
Capitalization46.09B
CGXYY vs CIIHY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGXYY vs. CIIHY commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXYY is a Hold and CIIHY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CGXYY: $21.30 vs. CIIHY: $20.98)
Brand notoriety: CGXYY and CIIHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGXYY: 57% vs. CIIHY: 26%
Market capitalization -- CGXYY: $14.46B vs. CIIHY: $46.09B
CGXYY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $14.46B. CIIHY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $46.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGXYY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileCIIHY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CGXYY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • CIIHY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGXYY is a better buy in the long-term than CIIHY.

Price Growth

CGXYY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -8.49% price change this week, while CIIHY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +133.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.61% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIIHY($46.1B) has a higher market cap than CGXYY($14.5B). CGXYY has higher P/E ratio than CIIHY: CGXYY (131.58) vs CIIHY (10.44). CGXYY YTD gains are higher at: -4.054 vs. CIIHY (-23.168). CIIHY has higher revenues than CGXYY: CIIHY (64.5B) vs CGXYY (18.6B).
CGXYYCIIHYCGXYY / CIIHY
Capitalization14.5B46.1B31%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.054-23.16817%
P/E Ratio131.5810.441,261%
Revenue18.6B64.5B29%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGXYY vs CIIHY: Fundamental Ratings
CGXYY
CIIHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9433
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1579
SMR RATING
1..100
68
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1417
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGXYY's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as CIIHY (23). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew similarly to CIIHY’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIIHY (79). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIIHY’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CIIHY (8). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew similarly to CIIHY’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CIIHY (62). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew similarly to CIIHY’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as CIIHY (17). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew similarly to CIIHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DOL55.140.55
+1.01%
WisdomTree International LargeCp Div ETF
SIXL36.470.24
+0.65%
ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Eq Strat ETF
DEM40.770.21
+0.52%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Div ETF
HIYS24.850.07
+0.27%
Invesco High Yield Select ETF
GOEX42.38-0.42
-0.97%
Global X Gold Explorers ETF

CGXYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGXYY and BRPHF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGXYY and BRPHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGXYY
1D Price
Change %
CGXYY100%
N/A
BRPHF - CGXYY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
CIIHF - CGXYY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIIHY - CGXYY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBKCF - CGXYY
-0%
Poorly correlated
+5.41%
BLVDF - CGXYY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CIIHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIIHY and FUTU have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIIHY and FUTU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIIHY
1D Price
Change %
CIIHY100%
N/A
FUTU - CIIHY
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
TIGR - CIIHY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
CESTY - CIIHY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMGGF - CIIHY
4%
Poorly correlated
+8.19%
CSOL - CIIHY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More