CHACU
Price
$10.30
Change
-$0.18 (-1.72%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
75.67M
MLAC
Price
$10.22
Change
-$0.04 (-0.39%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
43.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHACU vs MLAC

Header iconCHACU vs MLAC Comparison
Open Charts CHACU vs MLACBanner chart's image
Crane Hbr Acquisition
Price$10.30
Change-$0.18 (-1.72%)
Volume$723
Capitalization75.67M
Mountain Lake Acquisition
Price$10.22
Change-$0.04 (-0.39%)
Volume$524
Capitalization43.29M
CHACU vs MLAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHACU vs. MLAC commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHACU is a StrongBuy and MLAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CHACU: $10.30 vs. MLAC: $10.22)
Brand notoriety: CHACU and MLAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHACU: 0% vs. MLAC: 1%
Market capitalization -- CHACU: $75.67M vs. MLAC: $43.29M
CHACU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $75.67M. MLAC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $43.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHACU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHACU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHACU is a better buy in the long-term than MLAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLAC’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MLAC’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CHACU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -2.09% price change this week, while MLAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLAC is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHACU($75.7M) has a higher market cap than MLAC($43.3M). CHACU has higher P/E ratio than MLAC: CHACU (1743.55) vs MLAC (26.25). CHACU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 0 vs. MLAC (-1.84M). MLAC has more cash in the bank: 108K vs. CHACU (97.2K). CHACU has less debt than MLAC: CHACU (0) vs MLAC (3.38M). CHACU (0) and MLAC (0) have equivalent revenues.
CHACUMLACCHACU / MLAC
Capitalization75.7M43.3M175%
EBITDA0-1.84M-
Gain YTDN/AN/A-
P/E Ratio1743.5526.256,643%
Revenue00-
Total Cash97.2K108K90%
Total Debt03.38M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGXX3.070.39
+14.55%
Digi Power X Inc
ACN304.782.49
+0.82%
Accenture PLC
BPOP114.300.88
+0.77%
Popular
ABEO5.890.02
+0.34%
Abeona Therapeutics
ETWO3.25N/A
N/A
E2open Parent Holdings

CHACU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHACU and SVIIU have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHACU and SVIIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHACU
1D Price
Change %
CHACU100%
N/A
SVIIU - CHACU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLAC - CHACU
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIG - CHACU
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEAG - CHACU
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRL - CHACU
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
More

MLAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLAC has been loosely correlated with BOWNU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLAC jumps, then BOWNU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLAC
1D Price
Change %
MLAC100%
N/A
BOWNU - MLAC
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ATMV - MLAC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXAI - MLAC
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
LNZA - MLAC
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
BEEP - MLAC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
More