CHBJF
Price
$0.59
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
DSFGY
Price
$9.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

CHBJF vs DSFGY

Header iconCHBJF vs DSFGY Comparison
Open Charts CHBJF vs DSFGYBanner chart's image
China Citic Bank
Price$0.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$230
CapitalizationN/A
Dah Sing Financial Holdings
Price$9.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.1K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CHBJF vs DSFGY Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
CHBJF vs. DSFGY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHBJF is a Hold and DSFGY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CHBJF: $0.59 vs. DSFGY: $9.50)
Brand notoriety: CHBJF and DSFGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHBJF: 101% vs. DSFGY: 71%
Market capitalization -- CHBJF: $35.97B vs. DSFGY: $788.56M
CHBJF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $35.97B. DSFGY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $788.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHBJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDSFGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHBJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DSFGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DSFGY is a better buy in the long-term than CHBJF.

Price Growth

CHBJF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DSFGY (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHBJF($36B) has a higher market cap than DSFGY($789M). DSFGY has higher P/E ratio than CHBJF: DSFGY (5.77) vs CHBJF (3.00). DSFGY YTD gains are higher at: 75.489 vs. CHBJF (24.707). CHBJF has higher revenues than DSFGY: CHBJF (208B) vs DSFGY (7.25B).
CHBJFDSFGYCHBJF / DSFGY
Capitalization36B789M4,563%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.70775.48933%
P/E Ratio3.005.7752%
Revenue208B7.25B2,868%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt999BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHBJF vs DSFGY: Fundamental Ratings
CHBJF
DSFGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3680
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4968
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6848
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSFGY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBJF (4). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew similarly to CHBJF’s over the last 12 months.

CHBJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as DSFGY (68). This means that CHBJF’s stock grew similarly to DSFGY’s over the last 12 months.

CHBJF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as DSFGY (6). This means that CHBJF’s stock grew similarly to DSFGY’s over the last 12 months.

DSFGY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBJF (51). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew similarly to CHBJF’s over the last 12 months.

DSFGY's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBJF (68). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew similarly to CHBJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

CHBJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHBJF has been loosely correlated with IFHI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHBJF jumps, then IFHI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHBJF
1D Price
Change %
CHBJF100%
N/A
IFHI - CHBJF
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CAIXY - CHBJF
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
SYANY - CHBJF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FBSI - CHBJF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSFGY - CHBJF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
More

DSFGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSFGY and BKQNF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSFGY and BKQNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSFGY
1D Price
Change %
DSFGY100%
-1.04%
BKQNF - DSFGY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBJF - DSFGY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - DSFGY
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.02%
OFED - DSFGY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSNGY - DSFGY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
More