CHBJF
Price
$0.93
Change
-$0.04 (-4.12%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
58.99B
DSFGY
Price
$11.10
Change
+$1.95 (+21.31%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHBJF vs DSFGY

Header iconCHBJF vs DSFGY Comparison
Open Charts CHBJF vs DSFGYBanner chart's image
China Citic Bank
Price$0.93
Change-$0.04 (-4.12%)
Volume$659
Capitalization58.99B
Dah Sing Financial Holdings
Price$11.10
Change+$1.95 (+21.31%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.48B
CHBJF vs DSFGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHBJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DSFGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHBJF vs. DSFGY commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHBJF is a Buy and DSFGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CHBJF: $0.93 vs. DSFGY: $11.10)
Brand notoriety: CHBJF and DSFGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHBJF: 62% vs. DSFGY: 23%
Market capitalization -- CHBJF: $58.99B vs. DSFGY: $1.48B
CHBJF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $58.99B. DSFGY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHBJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDSFGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHBJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DSFGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CHBJF and DSFGY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHBJF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DSFGY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHBJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DSFGY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHBJF is a better buy in the short-term than DSFGY.

Price Growth

CHBJF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DSFGY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHBJF($59B) has a higher market cap than DSFGY($1.48B). CHBJF (5.66) and DSFGY (5.51) have similar P/E ratio . CHBJF YTD gains are higher at: 36.103 vs. DSFGY (12.252). CHBJF has higher revenues than DSFGY: CHBJF (211B) vs DSFGY (7.09B).
CHBJFDSFGYCHBJF / DSFGY
Capitalization59B1.48B3,997%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.10312.252295%
P/E Ratio5.665.51103%
Revenue211B7.09B2,976%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.45TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHBJF vs DSFGY: Fundamental Ratings
CHBJF
DSFGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3448
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1234
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSFGY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBJF (19). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew similarly to CHBJF’s over the last 12 months.

CHBJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as DSFGY (34). This means that CHBJF’s stock grew similarly to DSFGY’s over the last 12 months.

CHBJF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DSFGY (100). This means that CHBJF’s stock grew similarly to DSFGY’s over the last 12 months.

DSFGY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBJF (46). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew similarly to CHBJF’s over the last 12 months.

DSFGY's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBJF (100). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew similarly to CHBJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHBJFDSFGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHBJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DSFGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APPS4.260.07
+1.67%
Digital Turbine
TAOP3.200.02
+0.63%
Taoping Inc
EHC123.45-0.13
-0.11%
Encompass Health Corp
WLY40.16-0.41
-1.01%
John Wiley & Sons
FLYX4.01-0.22
-5.20%
flyExclusive

CHBJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHBJF has been loosely correlated with CAIXY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHBJF jumps, then CAIXY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHBJF
1D Price
Change %
CHBJF100%
N/A
CAIXY - CHBJF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
SYANY - CHBJF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FBSI - CHBJF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSFGY - CHBJF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFIC - CHBJF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DSFGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSFGY and BKQNF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSFGY and BKQNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSFGY
1D Price
Change %
DSFGY100%
N/A
BKQNF - DSFGY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBJF - DSFGY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - DSFGY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSNGY - DSFGY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
OFED - DSFGY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More