CHBJF
Price
$1.02
Change
+$0.06 (+6.25%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
35.97B
FBSI
Price
$26.21
Change
+$0.09 (+0.34%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
59.77M
6 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHBJF vs FBSI

Header iconCHBJF vs FBSI Comparison
Open Charts CHBJF vs FBSIBanner chart's image
China Citic Bank
Price$1.02
Change+$0.06 (+6.25%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization35.97B
First Bancshares
Price$26.21
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
Volume$200
Capitalization59.77M
CHBJF vs FBSI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHBJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHBJF vs. FBSI commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHBJF is a StrongBuy and FBSI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CHBJF: $1.02 vs. FBSI: $26.21)
Brand notoriety: CHBJF and FBSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHBJF: 10% vs. FBSI: 60%
Market capitalization -- CHBJF: $35.97B vs. FBSI: $59.77M
CHBJF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $35.97B. FBSI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $59.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHBJF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileFBSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHBJF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • FBSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHBJF is a better buy in the long-term than FBSI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHBJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBSI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHBJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FBSI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBSI is a better buy in the short-term than CHBJF.

Price Growth

CHBJF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.51% price change this week, while FBSI (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBSI is expected to report earnings on Jul 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHBJF($36B) has a higher market cap than FBSI($59.8M). FBSI has higher P/E ratio than CHBJF: FBSI (9.91) vs CHBJF (3.00). CHBJF YTD gains are higher at: 50.000 vs. FBSI (6.565). FBSI has less debt than CHBJF: FBSI (1.5M) vs CHBJF (999B). CHBJF has higher revenues than FBSI: CHBJF (208B) vs FBSI (20.6M).
CHBJFFBSICHBJF / FBSI
Capitalization36B59.8M60,201%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD50.0006.565762%
P/E Ratio3.009.9130%
Revenue208B20.6M1,009,709%
Total CashN/A55.6M-
Total Debt999B1.5M66,600,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHBJF vs FBSI: Fundamental Ratings
CHBJF
FBSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
719
SMR RATING
1..100
153
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1343
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHBJF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBSI (59). This means that CHBJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBSI’s over the last 12 months.

CHBJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as FBSI (19). This means that CHBJF’s stock grew similarly to FBSI’s over the last 12 months.

CHBJF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBSI (53). This means that CHBJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBSI’s over the last 12 months.

CHBJF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FBSI (57). This means that CHBJF’s stock grew similarly to FBSI’s over the last 12 months.

CHBJF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FBSI (43). This means that CHBJF’s stock grew similarly to FBSI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHBJFFBSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHBJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXEL46.151.85
+4.18%
Exelixis
AGYS115.293.22
+2.87%
Agilysys
XPER8.140.04
+0.49%
Xperi
KXIN0.95N/A
+0.28%
Kaixin Holdings
CRBP7.71-0.04
-0.52%
Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings

CHBJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHBJF has been loosely correlated with CAIXY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHBJF jumps, then CAIXY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHBJF
1D Price
Change %
CHBJF100%
N/A
CAIXY - CHBJF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
SYANY - CHBJF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FBSI - CHBJF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSFGY - CHBJF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFIC - CHBJF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FBSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBSI and MFDB have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBSI and MFDB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBSI
1D Price
Change %
FBSI100%
N/A
MFDB - FBSI
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBJF - FBSI
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOTB - FBSI
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNFSF - FBSI
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGNLF - FBSI
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More