CHDRF
Price
$575.00
Change
+$35.55 (+6.59%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
101.2B
LVMHF
Price
$601.50
Change
+$17.38 (+2.98%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
290.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHDRF vs LVMHF

Header iconCHDRF vs LVMHF Comparison
Open Charts CHDRF vs LVMHFBanner chart's image
Christian Dior S.E
Price$575.00
Change+$35.55 (+6.59%)
Volume$16
Capitalization101.2B
LVMH-Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton
Price$601.50
Change+$17.38 (+2.98%)
Volume$1.89K
Capitalization290.27B
CHDRF vs LVMHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHDRF vs. LVMHF commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHDRF is a Buy and LVMHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CHDRF: $575.00 vs. LVMHF: $601.50)
Brand notoriety: CHDRF and LVMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHDRF: 93% vs. LVMHF: 34%
Market capitalization -- CHDRF: $101.2B vs. LVMHF: $290.27B
CHDRF [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $101.2B. LVMHF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $290.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $290.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $38.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHDRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVMHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHDRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LVMHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHDRF is a better buy in the long-term than LVMHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHDRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVMHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHDRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LVMHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHDRF is a better buy in the short-term than LVMHF.

Price Growth

CHDRF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а +6.59% price change this week, while LVMHF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was +6.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+2.52% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVMHF($290B) has a higher market cap than CHDRF($101B). LVMHF has higher P/E ratio than CHDRF: LVMHF (23.49) vs CHDRF (19.57). CHDRF YTD gains are higher at: -6.352 vs. LVMHF (-8.406). CHDRF (25.5B) and LVMHF (25.5B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CHDRF (12.5B) and LVMHF (12.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . LVMHF has less debt than CHDRF: LVMHF (39.6B) vs CHDRF (49.6B). CHDRF (82.8B) and LVMHF (82.8B) have equivalent revenues.
CHDRFLVMHFCHDRF / LVMHF
Capitalization101B290B35%
EBITDA25.5B25.5B100%
Gain YTD-6.352-8.40676%
P/E Ratio19.5723.4983%
Revenue82.8B82.8B100%
Total Cash12.5B12.3B102%
Total Debt49.6B39.6B125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHDRF vs LVMHF: Fundamental Ratings
CHDRF
LVMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3228
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7374
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHDRF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVMHF (81). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CHDRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (74). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CHDRF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (100). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CHDRF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (61). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CHDRF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (100). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHDRFLVMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBK53.920.24
+0.45%
FB Financial Corp
NEXN9.84-0.02
-0.20%
Nexxen International Ltd
RCI35.70-0.08
-0.22%
Rogers Communications
OLB1.08-0.05
-4.16%
OLB Group Inc. (The)
LAZR1.76-0.08
-4.35%
Luminar Technologies Inc

CHDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHDRF has been loosely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHDRF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHDRF
1D Price
Change %
CHDRF100%
+6.59%
LVMUY - CHDRF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.96%
LVMHF - CHDRF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.97%
HESAY - CHDRF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
SWGAY - CHDRF
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
PPRUY - CHDRF
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.63%
More

LVMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVMHF has been closely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVMHF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVMHF
1D Price
Change %
LVMHF100%
+2.97%
LVMUY - LVMHF
98%
Closely correlated
+2.96%
HESAY - LVMHF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
CFRUY - LVMHF
77%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
HESAF - LVMHF
72%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
PPRUY - LVMHF
68%
Closely correlated
+2.63%
More