Advertisement
CHE vs FMS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHE is a StrongBuy and FMS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CHE (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -3.70% price change this week, while FMS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +3.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHE is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
FMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.09% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
| CHE | FMS | CHE / FMS | |
| Capitalization | 6.34B | 15.7B | 40% |
| EBITDA | 453M | 3.17B | 14% |
| Gain YTD | -17.561 | 21.322 | -82% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.41 | 20.43 | 110% |
| Revenue | 2.51B | 19.5B | 13% |
| Total Cash | 250M | 1.72B | 15% |
| Total Debt | 146M | 11B | 1% |
CHE | FMS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMS's Valuation (9) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHE (60). This means that FMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHE’s over the last 12 months.
FMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as CHE (100). This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to CHE’s over the last 12 months.
CHE's SMR Rating (39) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMS (86). This means that CHE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMS’s over the last 12 months.
FMS's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHE (82). This means that FMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHE’s over the last 12 months.
FMS's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHE (84). This means that FMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHE’s over the last 12 months.
| CHE | FMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 6 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 49% | 18 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ARKF | 58.57 | 1.02 | +1.77% |
| ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | |||
| RDTE | 33.90 | 0.09 | +0.27% |
| Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTECovCllStgyETF | |||
| VEGA | 49.07 | 0.12 | +0.24% |
| AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF | |||
| EIDO | 17.42 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | |||
| BMED | 27.86 | -0.05 | -0.16% |
| iShares Health Innovation Active ETF | |||
CHE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHE has been loosely correlated with OPCH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHE jumps, then OPCH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHE | 100% | -1.83% | ||
| OPCH - CHE | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| UHS - CHE | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| NHC - CHE | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| LTGHF - CHE | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HCA - CHE | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||
FMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with FSNUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then FSNUY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMS | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| FSNUY - FMS | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| DVA - FMS | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| DNTCF - FMS | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| OPCH - FMS | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| CHE - FMS | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||