It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHOO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHOO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHEF (@Food Distributors) experienced а +1.13% price change this week, while SHOO (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +10.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +17.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +67.68%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +4.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.67%.
CHEF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
SHOO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
@Wholesale Distributors (+4.30% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
CHEF | SHOO | CHEF / SHOO | |
Capitalization | 2.57B | 2.14B | 120% |
EBITDA | 213M | 160M | 133% |
Gain YTD | 26.946 | -29.807 | -90% |
P/E Ratio | 38.65 | 23.13 | 167% |
Revenue | 3.95B | 2.32B | 170% |
Total Cash | 96.9M | 112M | 87% |
Total Debt | 930M | 539M | 173% |
CHEF | SHOO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SHOO's Valuation (18) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHEF (82) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that SHOO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHEF’s over the last 12 months.
CHEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHOO (73) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that CHEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHOO’s over the last 12 months.
CHEF's SMR Rating (56) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as SHOO (67) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that CHEF’s stock grew similarly to SHOO’s over the last 12 months.
CHEF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as SHOO (60) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that CHEF’s stock grew similarly to SHOO’s over the last 12 months.
SHOO's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as CHEF (54) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that SHOO’s stock grew similarly to CHEF’s over the last 12 months.
CHEF | SHOO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 2 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 18 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago68% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOO has been loosely correlated with OXM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHOO jumps, then OXM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SHOO | 100% | +4.41% | ||
OXM - SHOO | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
KTB - SHOO | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
COLM - SHOO | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
DBI - SHOO | 62% Loosely correlated | +5.57% | ||
NKE - SHOO | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
More |