Advertisement
CHEOY vs CSBTF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHEOY is a Hold and CSBTF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHEOY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSBTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHEOY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CSBTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHEOY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSBTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHEOY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CSBTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CHEOY (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -5.76% price change this week, while CSBTF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -5.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSBTF is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.15% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| CHEOY | CSBTF | CHEOY / CSBTF | |
| Capitalization | 12.3B | 1.11B | 1,109% |
| EBITDA | 620M | 3.16M | 19,639% |
| Gain YTD | 6.728 | 25.388 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | 47.66 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.34B | 103M | 2,275% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 17.9M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.79M | - |
CHEOY | CSBTF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHEOY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as CSBTF (49). This means that CHEOY’s stock grew similarly to CSBTF’s over the last 12 months.
CSBTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as CHEOY (55). This means that CSBTF’s stock grew similarly to CHEOY’s over the last 12 months.
CHEOY's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSBTF (94). This means that CHEOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSBTF’s over the last 12 months.
CHEOY's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as CSBTF (61). This means that CHEOY’s stock grew similarly to CSBTF’s over the last 12 months.
CHEOY's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSBTF (100). This means that CHEOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSBTF’s over the last 12 months.
| CHEOY | CSBTF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 58% |
Advertisement
CHEOY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHEOY has been loosely correlated with TRUMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHEOY jumps, then TRUMY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHEOY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHEOY | 100% | -1.42% | ||
| TRUMY - CHEOY | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.22% | ||
| TWST - CHEOY | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
| HOCPY - CHEOY | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
| SKHHY - CHEOY | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.68% | ||
| ICLR - CHEOY | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.96% | ||
More | ||||
CSBTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSBTF and APYX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSBTF and APYX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSBTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSBTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| APYX - CSBTF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| DIZTF - CSBTF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHEOY - CSBTF | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
| CLPBF - CSBTF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CNVVF - CSBTF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||