CHFLF
Price
$0.77
Change
+$0.07 (+10.00%)
Updated
Dec 10 closing price
RGF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
95 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CHFLF vs RGF

Header iconCHFLF vs RGF Comparison
Open Charts CHFLF vs RGFBanner chart's image
CHINA FEIHE
Price$0.77
Change+$0.07 (+10.00%)
Volume$1.3K
CapitalizationN/A
Real Good Food Company (The)
Price$0.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9K
CapitalizationN/A
CHFLF vs RGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CHFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHFLF vs. RGF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHFLF is a Buy and RGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CHFLF: $0.77 vs. RGF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: CHFLF and RGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHFLF: 12% vs. RGF: 248%
Market capitalization -- CHFLF: $5.52B vs. RGF: $7.02M
CHFLF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5.52B. RGF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $7.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHFLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHFLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHFLF is a better buy in the long-term than RGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHFLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHFLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGF is a better buy in the short-term than CHFLF.

Price Growth

CHFLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RGF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -4.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

RGF is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-2.41% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHFLF($5.52B) has a higher market cap than RGF($7.02M). CHFLF has higher P/E ratio than RGF: CHFLF (7.57) vs RGF (6.71). CHFLF YTD gains are higher at: 43.541 vs. RGF (-84.868). CHFLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.12B vs. RGF (-32.82M). CHFLF has more cash in the bank: 16.5B vs. RGF (78K). RGF has less debt than CHFLF: RGF (144M) vs CHFLF (1.18B). CHFLF has higher revenues than RGF: CHFLF (20.9B) vs RGF (156M).
CHFLFRGFCHFLF / RGF
Capitalization5.52B7.02M78,656%
EBITDA8.12B-32.82M-24,736%
Gain YTD43.541-84.868-51%
P/E Ratio7.576.71113%
Revenue20.9B156M13,397%
Total Cash16.5B78K21,153,846%
Total Debt1.18B144M822%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHFLFRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CHFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VINC0.220.03
+12.97%
Vincerx Pharma
PLCE11.250.34
+3.12%
Children's Place
KIM24.30-0.13
-0.53%
Kimco Realty Corp
NARI56.16-0.59
-1.04%
Inari Medical
CGEM10.77-0.72
-6.27%
Cullinan Therapeutics

CHFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHFLF has been loosely correlated with CFEIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHFLF jumps, then CFEIY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHFLF
1D Price
Change %
CHFLF100%
N/A
CFEIY - CHFLF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.33%
STKH - CHFLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.63%
ZHYBF - CHFLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGF - CHFLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
QQFSF - CHFLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGF and LW have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGF
1D Price
Change %
RGF100%
+0.70%
LW - RGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.98%
UTZ - RGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.30%
ATPC - RGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.42%
PSYCF - RGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-15.38%
FAMI - RGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.76%
More