CHFLF vs YNNHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHFLF is a Hold and YNNHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHFLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYNNHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CHFLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- YNNHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
CHFLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -11.59% price change this week, while YNNHF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| CHFLF | YNNHF | CHFLF / YNNHF | |
| Capitalization | 5.52B | 2.37B | 233% |
| EBITDA | 8.12B | 1.05B | 771% |
| Gain YTD | 36.561 | 63.710 | 57% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.57 | 21.14 | 36% |
| Revenue | 20.9B | 6B | 348% |
| Total Cash | 16.5B | 1.61B | 1,028% |
| Total Debt | 1.18B | 129M | 917% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
CHFLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHFLF has been loosely correlated with CFEIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHFLF jumps, then CFEIY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHFLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHFLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CFEIY - CHFLF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| STKH - CHFLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
| ZHYBF - CHFLF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RGF - CHFLF | 4% Poorly correlated | -4.20% | ||
| QQFSF - CHFLF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
YNNHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that YNNHF and KIKOF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YNNHF and KIKOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YNNHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YNNHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KIKOF - YNNHF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TUFBY - YNNHF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TYCMY - YNNHF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
| CHFLF - YNNHF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RGF - YNNHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -4.20% | ||
More | ||||