Ad is loading...
CHIQ vs KWEB
CHIQ vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts CHIQ vs KWEB
Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF
Price$19.94
Change-$1.83 (-8.41%)
Volume$1K
Net Assets256.17M
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$31.23
Change-$3.32 (-9.61%)
Volume$51.43K
Net Assets8.15B
CHIQ vs KWEB Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHIQ vs. KWEB commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHIQ is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 8.15B vs. CHIQ (256M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than CHIQ: KWEB (18.194) vs CHIQ (14.700). CHIQ was incepted earlier than KWEB: CHIQ (15 years) vs KWEB (12 years). CHIQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). CHIQ (32.76) and KWEB (32.00) have matching turnover.
| CHIQ | KWEB | CHIQ / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 14.700 | 18.194 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 256M | 8.15B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Turnover | 32.76 | 32.00 | 102% |
| Yield | 2.26 | 2.94 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHIQ | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CHIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHIQ has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHIQ jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHIQ | 100% | -2.73% | ||
| BABA - CHIQ | 85% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| JD - CHIQ | 82% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| BZUN - CHIQ | 69% Closely correlated | -4.00% | ||
| VIPS - CHIQ | 69% Closely correlated | -3.32% | ||
| YUMC - CHIQ | 68% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
More | ||||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
More | ||||