Ad is loading...
CHIQ vs KWEB
CHIQ vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts CHIQ vs KWEB
Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF
Price$19.19
Change+$0.68 (+3.67%)
Volume$48.1K
Net Assets201.78M
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$29.38
Change+$0.87 (+3.05%)
Volume$34.37M
Net Assets5.19B
CHIQ vs KWEB Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHIQ vs. KWEB commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHIQ is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 5.19B vs. CHIQ (202M). CHIQ has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: CHIQ (1.106) vs KWEB (0.479). CHIQ was incepted earlier than KWEB: CHIQ (15 years) vs KWEB (11 years). KWEB has a higher turnover CHIQ (22.64) vs CHIQ (22.64).
| CHIQ | KWEB | CHIQ / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 1.106 | 0.479 | 231% |
| Net Assets | 202M | 5.19B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 22.64 | 60.00 | 38% |
| Yield | 2.32 | 1.76 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHIQ | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 87% | 24 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CHIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHIQ has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHIQ jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHIQ | 100% | +3.67% | ||
| BABA - CHIQ | 85% Closely correlated | +3.26% | ||
| JD - CHIQ | 82% Closely correlated | +10.11% | ||
| BZUN - CHIQ | 69% Closely correlated | +3.97% | ||
| YUMC - CHIQ | 68% Closely correlated | +3.33% | ||
| PDD - CHIQ | 65% Loosely correlated | +5.30% | ||
More | ||||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | +3.05% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | +3.26% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | +10.11% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | +2.89% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | +3.84% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | +2.71% | ||
More | ||||