CHKIF
Price
$0.35
Change
-$0.11 (-23.91%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
13.27B
CPCAY
Price
$6.84
Change
+$0.04 (+0.59%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
8.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHKIF vs CPCAY

Header iconCHKIF vs CPCAY Comparison
Open Charts CHKIF vs CPCAYBanner chart's image
China Southern Airlines
Price$0.35
Change-$0.11 (-23.91%)
Volume$80K
Capitalization13.27B
Cathay Pacific Airways
Price$6.84
Change+$0.04 (+0.59%)
Volume$493
Capitalization8.94B
CHKIF vs CPCAY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHKIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPCAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHKIF vs. CPCAY commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHKIF is a Hold and CPCAY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CHKIF: $0.35 vs. CPCAY: $6.84)
Brand notoriety: CHKIF and CPCAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHKIF: 434% vs. CPCAY: 14%
Market capitalization -- CHKIF: $13.27B vs. CPCAY: $8.94B
CHKIF [@Airlines] is valued at $13.27B. CPCAY’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $8.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $32.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $7.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHKIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCPCAY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHKIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CPCAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPCAY is a better buy in the long-term than CHKIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHKIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPCAY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHKIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CPCAY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPCAY is a better buy in the short-term than CHKIF.

Price Growth

CHKIF (@Airlines) experienced а -24.57% price change this week, while CPCAY (@Airlines) price change was -0.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPCAY is expected to report earnings on Apr 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (+2.72% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHKIF($13.3B) has a higher market cap than CPCAY($8.94B). CPCAY YTD gains are higher at: 14.875 vs. CHKIF (-36.909). CPCAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.3B vs. CHKIF (2.4B). CHKIF has higher revenues than CPCAY: CHKIF (173B) vs CPCAY (100B).
CHKIFCPCAYCHKIF / CPCAY
Capitalization13.3B8.94B149%
EBITDA2.4B14.3B17%
Gain YTD-36.90914.875-248%
P/E RatioN/A8.06-
Revenue173B100B173%
Total Cash16.4BN/A-
Total Debt203BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHKIF vs CPCAY: Fundamental Ratings
CHKIF
CPCAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8716
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10039
SMR RATING
1..100
93100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8624
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHKIF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CPCAY (93). This means that CHKIF’s stock grew similarly to CPCAY’s over the last 12 months.

CPCAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHKIF (100). This means that CPCAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHKIF’s over the last 12 months.

CHKIF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CPCAY (100). This means that CHKIF’s stock grew similarly to CPCAY’s over the last 12 months.

CPCAY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHKIF (92). This means that CPCAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHKIF’s over the last 12 months.

CPCAY's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHKIF (86). This means that CPCAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHKIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHKIFCPCAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHKIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPCAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DWAS84.790.96
+1.15%
Invesco Dorsey Wright SmallCap Momt ETF
PSCC34.460.31
+0.91%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Stapl ETF
GDXY15.010.12
+0.81%
YieldMax Gold Miners Opt Inc Strgy ETF
SCHE30.350.10
+0.33%
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF™
DBAW36.650.03
+0.07%
Xtrackers MSCI All World exUS Hdg Eq ETF

CHKIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHKIF and EJTTF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHKIF and EJTTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHKIF
1D Price
Change %
CHKIF100%
N/A
EJTTF - CHKIF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLAKF - CHKIF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLAKY - CHKIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
EIFZF - CHKIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELALF - CHKIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More

CPCAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPCAY and ACDVF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPCAY and ACDVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPCAY
1D Price
Change %
CPCAY100%
+0.57%
ACDVF - CPCAY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
CPCAF - CPCAY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EIFZF - CPCAY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHKIF - CPCAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLAKY - CPCAY
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
More